Case Note & Summary
The appellant, MRF Ltd., a company manufacturing automobile tyres and rubber products, filed Tax Case Appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for assessment years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, and 2008-2009. The Assessing Officer had disallowed the assessee's claim that medical reimbursement up to Rs.15,000 per employee per annum was not subject to Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT), relying on CBDT Circular No.8/2005. The assessee contended that under Section 17(2) proviso (v), such reimbursement is excluded from the definition of 'perquisite' and thus not taxable as a fringe benefit under Section 115WB(2). The CIT(A) and ITAT dismissed the appeals, upholding the levy. The High Court framed the substantial question of law: whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that medical reimbursement up to Rs.15,000 per employee is chargeable to FBT. The court analyzed Section 115WB(1)(a) and (3) read with Section 17(2) proviso (v), noting that the definition of 'fringe benefit' under Section 115WB(2) includes any privilege, service, facility, or amenity directly or indirectly provided by the employer to the employee, but excludes perquisites not taxable under Section 17(2). Since proviso (v) to Section 17(2) exempts medical reimbursement up to Rs.15,000 from being a perquisite, it cannot be considered a fringe benefit. The court held that the CBDT circular cannot override the clear statutory provisions. Accordingly, the appeals were allowed, and the assessment orders were set aside.
Headnote
A) Fringe Benefit Tax - Medical Reimbursement - Section 115WB(2) read with Section 17(2) proviso (v) of Income Tax Act, 1961 - CBDT Circular No.8/2005 - The issue was whether medical reimbursement up to Rs.15,000 per employee per annum, exempt from perquisite tax in the hands of the employee, is taxable as a fringe benefit on the employer. The court held that such reimbursement is not a fringe benefit under Section 115WB(2) as it is excluded from the definition of 'perquisite' under Section 17(2) proviso (v). The CBDT circular cannot override the statutory provisions. (Paras 1-9)
Issue of Consideration
Whether medical reimbursement up to Rs.15,000 per employee per annum is chargeable to Fringe Benefit Tax under Section 115WB(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Final Decision
Appeals allowed. The orders of the ITAT and assessment orders levying Fringe Benefit Tax on medical reimbursement up to Rs.15,000 per employee per annum are set aside.
Law Points
- Fringe Benefit Tax
- Medical Reimbursement
- Section 115WB
- Section 17(2)
- CBDT Circular
- Perquisite
- Employer Liability
Case Details
2026 LawText (MAD) (04) 115
T.C.A.No.193 of 2012, T.C.A.Nos.452 & 453 of 2011
Dr Justice G. Jayachandran, Mr Justice Shamim Ahmed
Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan for Mr.R.Venkataraman (for appellant), Mr.Prabhu Mukunth Arun Kumar, Standing Counsel (for respondent)
The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Large Tax Payer Unit, Chennai
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Tax Case Appeals under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 against orders of ITAT upholding levy of Fringe Benefit Tax on medical reimbursement.
Remedy Sought
Appellant sought to set aside assessment orders levying FBT on medical reimbursement up to Rs.15,000 per employee per annum.
Filing Reason
Assessing Officer disallowed claim that medical reimbursement up to Rs.15,000 is not subject to FBT, relying on CBDT Circular No.8/2005.
Previous Decisions
CIT(A) and ITAT dismissed appeals, upholding the levy of FBT.
Issues
Whether medical reimbursement up to Rs.15,000 per employee per annum is chargeable to Fringe Benefit Tax under Section 115WB(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Submissions/Arguments
Appellant argued that under Section 17(2) proviso (v), medical reimbursement up to Rs.15,000 is excluded from definition of 'perquisite' and thus not taxable as fringe benefit under Section 115WB(2). CBDT Circular cannot override statutory provisions.
Respondent relied on CBDT Circular No.8/2005 to justify levy of FBT on such reimbursement.
Ratio Decidendi
Medical reimbursement up to Rs.15,000 per employee per annum is excluded from the definition of 'perquisite' under Section 17(2) proviso (v) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and therefore cannot be treated as a 'fringe benefit' under Section 115WB(2) for levy of Fringe Benefit Tax on the employer. CBDT Circular No.8/2005 cannot override the clear statutory provisions.
Judgment Excerpts
The claim of the assessee Company is that, as per Section 17 of the Income Tax Act, medical reimbursement by the company to its employees is a taxable perquisite only if the amount exceeds Rs.15,000/- per annum.
The CBDT Circular No.8 of 2005 which was issued to clarify the provisions of the Act cannot override the object of the Act.
Procedural History
Assessing Officer passed assessment orders for AYs 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009 levying FBT on medical reimbursement. Assessee appealed to CIT(A) which dismissed appeals. Further appeals to ITAT were also dismissed. Assessee then filed Tax Case Appeals under Section 260A before the High Court.
Acts & Sections
- Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 260A, Section 115WB, Section 17(2), Section 115WB(2), Section 115WB(1)(a), Section 115WB(3)
