Search Results for "retrospective grant"

1187 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1187 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Government Employee's Writ Petition Seeking Arrears of Pay for Notional Promotion. Court Holds that Under Rule 27(17) of Fundamental Rules, an Employee Not Entitled to Monetary Benefits for Post Not Actually Worked Despite Retrospective Promotion Following Acquittal.

The petitioner, S. Velammal, was appointed as a Typist in the Co-operative Audit Department in 1981 and rose to the post of Senior Inspector of Co-ope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit Seeking Removal of Managing Director on Ground of Age Limit Under Companies Act, 2013. Section 196(3)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 Held Not Retrospective and Does Not Automatically Terminate Existing Appointments.

The plaintiff, a director of Ultramarine & Pigments Limited, filed a suit seeking an order to restrain the 2nd defendant, the Chairman and Managing Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Regulatory Appeal on Trial Forum under Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Procedural Amendment to Section 26 by the 2002 Amendment Act Held Retrospective, and All Pending Trials for Pre-2002 Offences Must Proceed Before Special Court as per the 2014 Amendment.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals and writ petitions concerning the correct forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Restoration of Incentive Increment to District Awardee Teacher. Government Resolution dated 24/08/2017 does not ipso facto withdraw benefit conferred under Circular dated 12/12/2000.

The petitioner, Ramesh S/o Hirachand Nandurkar, a District Awardee Teacher employed with the Zilla Parishad, Amravati, was granted one additional incr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition in MRTP Act Purchase Notice Case - Deemed Lapse of Reservation Upheld. Amendment to Section 127(1) Enlarging Period for Acquisition Steps Does Not Apply to Purchase Notices Served Before Amendment, as Right to Lapse Had Already Accrued.

The petitioners, owners of 0.54 hectares of land in Pusad, had their land reserved for a primary school under the final development plan published on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses MSEDCL's Challenge to CGRF Order Setting Aside Retrospective Subsidy Recovery. Retrospective Recovery of VM Subsidy Without Prior Notice Held Unjust Under MERC Regulations.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged the final order dated 15.01.2025 passed by the Consume...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Daughter's Right to Coparcenary Share Under Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act Despite Father's Death Before 1956 Act. Daughter Granted 1/4th Share in Suit Property as Amendment is Retrospective and Confers Coparcenary Rights from Birth.

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgments of the trial court and the first appellate court in a partiti...