Search Results for "recovery after retirement"

544 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 544 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Recovery from Gratuity of Retired Class III and IV Employees. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong pay fixation without fault of employee is impermissible after retirement.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) employed with Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The petitioners, J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Agricultural Officer for Excess Pension Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Prolonged Delay. Recovery of Inadvertently Paid Excess Pension Without Misrepresentation or Fraud Held Impermissible Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, a former Agricultural Officer, retired on 30.04.2014 and was receiving a monthly pension of Rs.43,921 under PPO No.RO-713261. The resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired Employee in Excess Payment Recovery Case — Recovery from Pension Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Recovery of Rs.1,35,513/- from pension quashed as no opportunity of hearing was given before ordering recovery.

The petitioner, Dattatraya s/o Kalu Patil, was appointed as Extension Officer Statistics by the respondent no.5 on 19.10.1994. He was granted higher p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Leave Encashment Dispute — Recovery of Mistaken Payment from Gratuity Held Unjust. Petitioner's Leave Encashment Payment Was Not Mistaken as Government Resolution Did Not Apply to Non-Teaching Staff of Social Work Colleges.

The petitioner, Prakash Suryabhanji Ninghot, was appointed as a Peon on 01.10.1982 with respondent 5-College, a 100% grant-in-aid Social Work college....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows State Appeal in Excess Salary Recovery Dispute; Sets Aside Interest Award in Retired Employee's Case. Recovery of Excess Salary Held Impermissible Absent Misrepresentation or Undertaking on the Eve of Retirement, Aligning with Principles Against Hardship.

The High Court of Madras adjudicated a writ appeal filed by the State of Tamil Nadu challenging a single judge's order that had directed refund of exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Challenge to Continuation of Departmental Enquiry; Rules No Provision to Continue Enquiry After Superannuation. Employee Entitled to Full Retiral Benefits as MAIDC Rules Do Not Permit Post-Retirement Disciplinary Proceedings.

The petitioner, a former Regional Manager of the Maharashtra Agro Industries Development Corporation Limited (MAIDC), filed a writ petition seeking to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary from Retired Employee's Pension. Recovery from retiral dues set aside as employee did not misrepresent and pay fixation was departmental error.

The Petitioner, Vinay Mhatre, was appointed as a Tracer in the Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran (formerly Maharashtra Water Supply & Sewerage Project Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Pay Fixation Dispute — No Misrepresentation by Employee. Recovery of Rs.3,46,931/- from pension set aside as order passed without notice and employee not responsible for pay fixation error.

The petitioner, Rangrao s/o Mersing Jadhav, was appointed as a Peon on 08.11.1983 and superannuated on 31.08.2017 as Junior Administrative Officer (Su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Recovery of Overpayment from Retired Teacher's Terminal Benefits. Overpayment due to wrong pay fixation under Sixth Pay Commission cannot be recovered after retirement, especially when no misrepresentation by employee.

The petitioner, Issak Abbas Hawaldar, was appointed as a Primary Teacher in Panchayat Samiti, Arale, in November 1976 as a Class-IV employee. He retir...