Search Results for "proposed cooperative society"

386 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 386 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cooperative Society Bye-Law Amendment for Lack of Quorum and Procedural Irregularities. Amendment to Bye-Law 24(c) restricting voting rights to one member per family set aside as resolution passed without requisite quorum and without proper notice.

The petitioners, Uday Dalal, Ajay Biyani, Rina Pritish Nandy, and Prachi Agarwal, are members of the Malboro House Coop. Housing Society Limited, a co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition of Cooperative Society Seeking Division of Assets Under Section 79 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. Court Holds That Section 79 Does Not Apply to Division of Assets After Bifurcation Under Section 18C, and Petitioner Must Seek Implementation of Government Order.

The petitioner, a cooperative society registered for the Bhandara district, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Society Dispute — Dispute Under Section 91 of MCS Act Maintainable Against Expulsion Under Section 35. Cooperative Court Has Jurisdiction to Decide Validity of Expulsion Resolution, Remedy Under Section 91 Not Barred by Section 35 Appeal.

The appellant, a member of the respondent housing society, filed a dispute under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 before ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...