Search Results for "payment vouchers"

125 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 125 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Income Tax Reassessment. Failure to Provide Documents and Cross-Examination Renders Assessment Invalid Under Section 143(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, M/s R.R. Infraa Construction, a partnership firm, challenged three orders passed by the Income Tax Department for the Assessment Year ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in CBI Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Criminal Appeal Allowed Against Conviction Under Sections 409 and 477A IPC for Alleged Misappropriation of Rs. 2912.70 by Double Entries in Cash Book.

The appellant, Madhukar s/o Maroti Chandekar, was convicted by the Special Court for CBI (ACB) in Special Case No.11/1992 (renumbered as 6/2003) for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal, Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator in Insurance Claim Dispute. Discharge Voucher Signed Under Protest and Coercion Does Not Bar Arbitration Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves an appeal by The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. against a Bombay High Court order appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Gratuity for Bank Employee Found Guilty of Financial Irregularities. Disciplinary Inquiry Sufficient for Forfeiture Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Acts Amount to Wilful Omission and Moral Turpitude.

The petitioner, Nanubhai Nichhabhai Desai, worked as a clerk with UCO Bank for over 31 years. His services were terminated by compulsory retirement wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition for Time-Barred Debt Under Companies Act, 1956. Claim for Goods Supplied in 2006-2007 Held Barred by Limitation as Petition Filed Beyond Three Years from Last Payment in 2011.

The petitioner, Nasir Amin Hungund, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 against M/s. Glasspaane Aluminium (I) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Television Production Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Reputation. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that claimant failed to prove loss of reputation due to alleged breach of contract.

The petitioners, Star India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Bogus Purchases Case — No Jurisdictional Error Found. Settlement Commission's Discretion to Accept Additional Income Disclosure Under Section 245D of Income Tax Act, 1961 Upheld as Not Perverse or Unreasonable.

The Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune) filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 21 September 201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Case. Settlement Commission's order upheld as valid exercise of power under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962 granting immunity from interest.

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Customs, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Challenging Reinstatement Order. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Contractor System, Termination Held Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, challenged the order of the Industrial Court dated 17/9/1999, which reversed the Labou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail in Unlawful Activities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Terrorist Act. Applicants Granted Pre-Arrest Bail Under Section 438 CrPC as Allegations of Waging War Against Government and Unlawful Activities Not Substantiated.

The judgment pertains to multiple criminal applications filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking anticipatory ba...