Search Results for "own use"

6642 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6642 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit by 'VOGUE' Magazine Owner Against 'JUST IN VOGUE' Retail Services. Well-Known Mark 'VOGUE' Protected Against Use for Dissimilar Services Under Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiffs, Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and its subsidiary, are the proprietors and users of the trademark 'VOGUE' in respect of magazines a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case on Residential Complex Construction. Construction of Residential Complex for ITC Limited for Use as Guest House Not Taxable as Commercial or Industrial Construction Service Under Section 65(105)(zzq) of Finance Act, 1994.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise, Service Tax & Customs) against the order of the Customs, Excise & Service ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trade Mark Registrations for 'WHISPER' and 'ALWAYS' Marks — Petitioner's Prior Use and Well-Known Status Established, Respondent's Registration Cancelled.

The petitioner, The Procter & Gamble Company, a multinational corporation, filed three original petitions under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Against Defendants Over 'SUNCONTROL' Mark. The Court held that 'SUNCONTROL' is descriptive and not distinctive, and that the plaintiff failed to establish secondary meaning or likelihood of confusion.

The plaintiff, Garware Polyester Limited, filed a suit for trade mark infringement and passing off against 3M Company and 3M India Limited, alleging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds That Motor Vehicle Under Repair at Garage is 'Use' for Purposes of Compensation Liability Under Motor Vehicles Act. Court Clarifies That Vehicles Stationed for Repair Fall Within Section 147 Liability, Rejecting Insurer's Narrow Interpretation of 'Use'.

The appeal arose from an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, awarding compensation of Rs. 8,26,000 with interest to the dependents of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Must Be Served on the Person Actually Using the Premises, Not the Owner Alone.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Amit Surendra Mittal (respondent) under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.205 of 2023

The plaintiff, VGN Projects Estates Private Limited, filed commercial suit no.205 of 2023 against the defendants, M/s. VGK Builders Pvt. Ltd. and M/s....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Defendant from Using Similar Trademark in Instant Adhesive Case. Affirms Likelihood of Confusion Between 'FEVIKWIK' and 'KWIKHEAL' Based on Overall Similarity of Marks and Trade Dress.

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, a leading manufacturer of adhesives and sealants, filed a suit against Poma-Ex Products and others for tra...