Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.205 of 2023

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
Admin
2026-07-31 18:29:26
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, VGN Projects Estates Private Limited, filed commercial suit no.205 of 2023 against the defendants, M/s. VGK Builders Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. VGK Property Developers Pvt. Ltd., seeking reliefs for trademark infringement and passing off. The plaintiff claimed registered trademark 'VGN' and alleged that the defendants' use of 'VGK' was deceptively similar. The suit sought permanent injunction, delivery up of infringing materials, and rendition of accounts. The judgment text provided is incomplete and contains only the plaint prayers; no court reasoning or decision is available.

Issue of Consideration

C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.205 of 2023

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 4

C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.205 of 2023

2025-03-12

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

2025:MHC:705

VGN Projects Estates Private Limited

M/s. VGK Builders Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. VGK Property Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Commercial suit for trademark infringement and passing off

Remedy Sought

Permanent injunction against infringement and passing off, delivery up of infringing materials, and rendition of accounts.

Filing Reason

Plaintiff alleged that defendants were using the mark 'VGK' which was deceptively similar to its registered trademark 'VGN'.

Procedural History

The suit was filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules and Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Sections 134 & 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, seeking permanent injunction and other reliefs.

Acts & Sections

  • Trade Marks Act, 1999: 134, 135
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order VII Rule 1
  • Madras High Court Original Side Rules: Order IV Rule 1
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Trademark Infringement Passing Off Permanent Injunction Deceptive Similarity VGK VGN Commercial Suit Trade Marks Act, 1999

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.205 of 2023 2026-07-31 18:29:26
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Plaint Not Barred by Section 70 of Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960. Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application Rejected as Suit Discloses Cause of Action an... 2026-07-31 18:29:22
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder Compensation burden of proof benefit of doubt Limitation Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising Out of Use ...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Disability A...

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antec...

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Rajya Sabha Nomination Due ...

Supreme Court Allows Pension to Casual Labourers with Temporary Status in Department of Po...

Lost Your Password?