Search Results for "oral interview marks"

159 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 159 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Anganwadi Sevika Challenging Cancellation of Appointment Due to Unauthorized Modification of Marks by CEO. CEO Cannot Act as Examiner or Moderator in Selection Process Under ICDS Scheme.

The petitioner, Munnabai Dagdu Gaikwad, was selected and appointed as an Anganwadi Sevika on 24 June 2011 after being ranked first in the merit list b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Non-Appointment as District Judge Due to Criminal Antecedents. Court upholds High Court's decision that acquittal does not automatically entitle a candidate to judicial appointment, as suitability includes character assessment.

The petitioner, Khushalchand Bhairulal Varma, applied for the post of District Judge in Maharashtra pursuant to an advertisement dated 28 July 2008. H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Selection of Anganwadi Workers in Satara District. Selection Process Upheld as Valid Under Maharashtra Anganwadi Workers Recruitment Rules, 2012.

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by unsuccessful candidates challenging the selection of Anganwadi workers (Bal Sevika) by the Jilh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Order in Anganwadi Sevika Appointment Dispute. Private Institution Experience Certificate Not Valid Under Government Resolutions for Awarding Experience Marks.

The petitioner, Chhaya Vasantrao Shinde, challenged the judgment and order dated 07.01.2015 of the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad (Respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Plea for Issuance of Appointment Letters to Work Inspectors. Petitioners sought mandamus to enforce selection endorsements dated 25.09.2017; one petition also challenged the selection process under Article 16 of the Constitution of India.

The writ petitions were filed by numerous candidates seeking appointment to the post of Work Inspector in the Department of Municipal Administration, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Rajasthan High Court's Decision to Fix Minimum Cut-Off Marks After Examination in Translator Recruitment. Fixing 75% Cut-Off After Examination Held Impermissible as It Alters Selection Procedure Mid-Process Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The case arose from a recruitment process initiated by the Rajasthan High Court in 2009 for 13 posts of Translators. The applicable rules, as amended ...