Search Results for "literary work"

66 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 66 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation of Souza and Padamsee Artworks as Obscene — Customs Officer's Personal Opinion Insufficient to Brand Art as Obscene Under Section 11 Customs Act, 1962. Artistic merit and community standards must be considered before declaring artworks obscene.

The petitioner, M/s. B. K. Polimex India Private Limited, imported seven artworks by world-renowned artists F.N. Souza and Akbar Padamsee from London ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Copyright Infringement Suit Against Film 'Baaghi' — No Substantial Similarity Found Between Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Works. The court held that similarities were at the level of general ideas, not protectable expression under the Copyright Act, 1957.

The Plaintiffs, XYZ Films LLC, PT Merantau Films, and Sikhya Entertainment Private Limited, filed a copyright infringement suit against UTV Motion Pic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Police Patil Challenging Cancellation of Kerosene Retail Licence. Police Patil is not a Government Servant and is Permitted to Engage in Local Business Under Rule 8 of the Maharashtra Village Police Patil Rules, 1968.

The petitioner, Ishwar S/o Vithalrao Mohite, is a Police Patil and has been running a retail kerosene shop in village Ghodki, Tq. Washi, Dist. Osmanab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to D.Litt. Treatise Disapproval by University Academic Council. Academic Decision Based on Expert Reports Upheld as No Bias or Procedural Violation Established.

The petitioner, Professor Dr. Nayyar P. Siddiqui, filed a writ petition challenging the communication dated 22/9/2005 from the Deputy Registrar (Ph.D....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes University's Disapproval of D.Litt. Treatise Due to Bias and Non-Compliance with Ordinance 111. Academic Council's decision set aside for failing to follow prescribed procedure and considering biased examiner report.

The petitioner, Professor Dr. Nayyar P. Siddiqui, a lecturer, submitted a treatise titled 'English and Urdu Poetry: A Parallel Literary Study' for the...