Search Results for "escalation claim"

246 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 246 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee Against Tariff Revision for Change in Law Under Electricity Act, 2003. Non-Allocation of Coal Linkage Despite Government Assurance Constitutes Change in Law Entitling Generating Company to Compensatory Tariff.

The case involves a dispute between Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL), an electricity distribution licensee in Rajasthan, and Adani Power Raj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Arbitration Case. Court upholds arbitral award allowing contractor's claims for hidden expenses and interest, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Irrigation Department, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Petition in Arbitration Dispute Over Bridge Construction. Arbitral Award Upheld as Not Contrary to Public Policy Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (owner), entered into a contract with the respondent, M/s. Oriental Construction Company Limited (co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition for Rehabilitation Project. Court Condones Delay and Grants 10% Cumulative Escalation for Potential Development, Denies Interest for Delayed Filing.

The Supreme Court partly allowed appeals by claimants seeking enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Hirehalla project. The Government notifi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Land Acquisition Appeal — State Partly Successful. Court holds that Reference Court's reliance on non-comparable exemplar sale deeds was erroneous, reducing market value from Rs.3,00,000/- to Rs.2,25,000/- per acre under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The State of Karnataka and other appellants filed an appeal under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against the Judgment and Award dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Upholds Rejection of Price Escalation and Interest Claims. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contract Clause 70C and Discretion on Quantum Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, a consortium of M/s. Valecha Engineering Limited and M/s. AMA Private Limited, entered into a contract with the respondent, Airports A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Arbitrator's Award of Interest on Escalation Amount Upheld as Not Contrary to Contract Terms.

The case involves an appeal by Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation against a judgment of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Parbhani...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference, Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Determined Market Value Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Potential for Development, Rejecting Government's Valuation Method.

The case is a land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arising from the acquisition of land belonging to Godrej ...