Search Results for "dereliction of duty"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "dereliction of duty"

72 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 72 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachment on Public Land in Writ of Mandamus — Representation Must Be Considered Within Three Months. Statutory Authority Has Duty to Consider Representation; Non-Consideration Amounts to Dereliction of Duty Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

23 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Muthulakshmi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, ...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Removal of Encroachment in Writ of Mandamus — Statutory Authority Must Act Within Three Months. Non-consideration of representation amounts to dereliction of duty under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and the court directed the respondents to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation regarding removal of shops from Survey No.314.

23 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Muthulakshmi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court s...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment of Government Poramboke Land. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

23 Jan 2025

The petitioner, S. Saravanan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, ...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representation on Encroachment Allegations in Writ of Mandamus — Court Emphasizes Duty of Statutory Authority to Decide Representations Within Stipulated Time. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, justifying direction under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

23 Jan 2025

The petitioner, M. Rathinam, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court se...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs District Collector to Consider Representation for Temple Festival Permission — Mandamus Issued for Karagam Eduppu Thiruvizha and Manjuvirattu. Statutory Authority Must Consider Representation Within Reasonable Time; Non-Consideration Amounts to Dereliction of Duty Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

10 Jan 2025

The petitioners, S.Thenan and T.Thirupathi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madra...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment Removal in Cart Track Way — Mandamus Issued for Disposal Within Stipulated Time. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, justifying a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

10 Jan 2025

The petitioner, K. Manokaran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court s...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation Against Jallikattu Sport and Selective Honours During Pongal Festival. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting direction under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

10 Jan 2025

The petitioners, K.R.Chelladurai and S.Veerappan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation Against Unapproved Construction Under Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, justifying writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

10 Jan 2025

The petitioner, S. Lakshmanan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to forbear respondents ...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation Against Illegal Quarrying — Mandamus Issued for Disposal Within Three Months. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

7 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Senthilkumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Mandamus to direct respondents 2 to 6 (th...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment Allegations in Public Street. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting direction under Article 226 of Constitution of India to consider representation within three months.

7 Jan 2025

The petitioner, M.Nallathambi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court seek...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)