Search Results for "contempt proceedings"

79 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 79 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Enforces Foreign Arbitration Award Amid Allegations of Bias. India reaffirms its commitment to enforcing foreign arbitration awards, dismissing challenges based on bias and public policy.

The Supreme Court of India upheld the Bombay High Court's decision to enforce a foreign arbitration award rendered by the Singapore International Arbi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Disposes of Special Leave Petition in Landlord-Tenant Dispute Based on Amicable Settlement. Ejectment Order Passed Under Delhi Rent Control Act, 1995 with Tenant Granted Time to Vacate Until February 28, 2025 and Undertaking Recorded for Enforcement.

The dispute involved landlords (petitioners) and a tenant (respondent) concerning Bungalow No. 97, Ground Floor, Sunder Nagar, New Delhi. The landlord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition in Contempt Case Due to Suppression of Material Facts. Litigant Found Guilty of Attempting to Pollute Stream of Justice by Concealing Facts and Filing Fabricated Documents, Not Entitled to Relief Under Tainted Hands Doctrine.

The Supreme Court addressed a case involving a litigant's attempt to pollute the administration of justice through suppression of material facts. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petitioners in Police Act Case Upholding Regulation of Processions. Police Authority Under Section 30 of Police Act, 1861, to Deny Permission for Route March Based on Law and Order Concerns Was Upheld as Justified.

The dispute originated from a batch of 49 writ petitions filed by office bearers of the Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh (RSS) before the Madras High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...