KAHC020110942015_1
13 Dec 2023...
Search Results for "amenity"
283 result(s) found
Found 283 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Developers' Challenge to PMC's Differential Development Charges Policy. Held that imposing higher development charges on properties within 100 meters of DP road while exempting others violates Article 14 of the Constitution.
20 Oct 2023The petitioners, a group of developers and a real estate association, challenged the policy of the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) that imposed highe...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Rejection of Layout Plans Under MRTP Act — Director of Town Planning Exceeded Jurisdiction by Reopening Sanctioned Layouts. Deemed Sanction Under Section 47 of Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966 Applies When Authority Fails to Decide Appeal Within Four Months.
3 Feb 2023The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Manmad, Nashik, sought to develop their lands by submitting layout plans to the Manmad Municipal Coun...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Conversion of Open Space to Commercial Plot by MIDC — Violation of Public Trust and Statutory Procedure. Allotment of Reserved Open Space Without Following Section 14 of MIDC Act and Without Public Auction is Illegal.
5 Jul 2022The petitioners, residents of Waluj Industrial Area, Aurangabad, and one of them being an industrial unit holder, challenged the action of the Maharas...
- 46
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Dismisses Writ Petition Against Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order Upholding Lokayukta Enquiry. Court Holds That Challenge to Entrustment of Departmental Enquiry is Premature and Petitioner Can Raise All Contentions After Enquiry Concludes.
24 Feb 2020The dispute arose from an illegal construction on a civic amenity site under the Mullamari Irrigation Project. In 2007, Smt. Mahananda, an allottee, b...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Flat Purchase Dispute — Upholds Dismissal of Suit Challenging Additional Construction. Court holds that flat purchasers cannot enforce sanctioned layout plans against developer in absence of express contractual covenant or statutory obligation under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.
25 Jan 2019The appellant, Shri Vitthal Laxman Patil, was a flat purchaser in a project called 'Kores Nakshatra' developed by Kores (India) Ltd. Real Estate Divis...
- 194
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Possession in Property Dispute — Unregistered Agreements for Sale of Tenanted Premises Held Invalid for Want of Registration Under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908. The court held that unregistered conveyances do not confer title and cannot be used to claim possession against tenants.
8 Apr 2015The plaintiff, Parwan Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for possession of Unit No.1C admeasuring 976 sq. ft. against the defendants, claiming owner...
- 125
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeals, Remands Case for Fresh Assessment, Clarifies Taxability of Unauthorised Structures and Reassessment of Land. Unauthorised Structures Held Liable to Property Tax Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, While Land Already Assessed Cannot Be Reassessed.
5 Nov 2014The four first appeals before the Bombay High Court arose out of orders passed by the Small Causes Court in municipal appeals concerning the fixation ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Additional DRCs in Road Construction Case — Mandamus Issued to MCGM to Issue DRCs for Balance 75% Area of Amenity Road Constructed and Taken Over. Petitioners entitled to DRCs for entire area under Development Control Regulations Appendix VII(6) based on Supreme Court precedent.
10 Jul 2014The petitioners, Novartis India Limited, Oberoi Realty Limited, and Shri Vikas Oberoi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...
- 147
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Illegal Construction in Residential Zone. Unauthorized construction in residential zone without valid development permission is liable for demolition under MRTP Act and BMC Act.
30 Nov -0001The case involves two writ petitions filed by Sharvan Developers Private Limited and others, and by Jayesh Mehta and others, challenging a demolition ...
- 181
