Search Results for "Workmen’s Compensation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Workmen’s Compensation"

1108 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1108 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Claim of No Direct Employment. Commissioner's Award of Rs.5,65,065 with 12% Interest and 50% Penalty Upheld Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

6 Feb 2026

The present appeal was filed under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, by the appellant, who was the employer before the learned Workm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Release of Compensation Amount Deposited Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 — Directs Payment to Legal Heirs Without Requirement of Succession Certificate or No-Objection Certificate from Other Heirs. The Court held that the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation cannot insist on a succession certificate or no-objection certificate from other legal heirs before disbursing compensation to the dependents of the deceased workman under Section 8 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

22 Oct 2013

The petitioners, legal representatives of deceased Rajendra Nivrutti Jadhav, filed a Claim Petition under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 before ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case Due to Lack of Pleadings and Evidence of Accidental Injury. Death of cable man from heart attack not compensable under Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 as no causal connection with employment established.

6 Mar 2020

The case involves an appeal by the employer, Western Coal Fields Limited, against an order of the Commissioner under the Employee's Compensation Act, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company Appeals in Workmen Compensation Cases — Upholds Commissioner's Award for Injuries Sustained by Cleaner and Hamal. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Absence of Written Contract; Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

25 Jul 2025

The appellant, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., filed six miscellaneous first appeals under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order Under Section 10-A of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 — Summary Deposit Cannot Be Ordered When Employer Denies Liability. Employer-Employee Relationship Disputed, Commissioner Must Follow Regular Procedure Under the Act.

11 Jun 2014

The Petitioner, Prompt Landmarks Pvt. Ltd., a construction company, challenged an order dated 4 May 2013 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Comp...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Compensation Award to Legal Heirs of Deceased Driver in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer's Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Evidence on Contributory Negligence and Non-Impleadment of Necessary Party. The court held that the employer failed to prove contributory negligence and that the accident arose out of and in the course of employment under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

12 Feb 2014

The appeal was filed by the District Animal Husbandry Officer, Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal, against the judgment and order dated 11/3/2010 passed by the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Rejection of Joint Memo and Excessive Compensation Set Aside. Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation erred in rejecting joint compromise memo and awarding compensation exceeding claimant's entitlement under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

2 Apr 2013

The appellant, Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, against the ju...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals in Workmen's Compensation Cases — Cleaners Held to Be Employees of Lorry Owner, Not Gratuitous Passengers. The court upheld the Commissioner's finding that the cleaners were workmen under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and the insurance company was liable to indemnify the owner.

1 Dec 2020

The appellant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed five appeals under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, challenging the judgment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Penalty Set Aside as Employer Had Not Failed to Deposit Compensation Without Just Cause. Employer's delay in depositing compensation was due to pending insurance claim, not willful default, so penalty under Section 4A(3)(b) of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 is not automatic.

21 Dec 2005

The appellant, Ramalu Balkrishna Sagar, owned a truck (MH-31/W-4943) which was involved in an accident on 01.06.2001, resulting in the death of the dr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Appeals in Motor Accident and Workmen Compensation Cases — Upholds Awards for Injured Driver and Deceased Victim's Dependents. Insurer's Liability Affirmed Despite Alleged Policy Violations and Lack of Driving License.

5 Jan 2015

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad disposed of a batch of miscellaneous first appeals filed by insurance companies against awards of compensation ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)