Search Results for "Western Coalfields"

175 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 175 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Interpretation — GST Inclusion Dispute in Coal Mining Contract. The court set aside the letter of acceptance and directed reconsideration of the bid price as exclusive of GST based on tender conditions.

The petitioners, SMS Limited and Mr. Nirbhay Sancheti, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows WCL Petition in Service Dispute — Labour Court Order Under Section 33(C)(2) Quashed for Lack of Jurisdiction. Claim for Higher Grade and Arrears from 1974 to 2014 Held Not Maintainable Without Prior Adjudication and Barred by Limitation.

The petitioners, Western Coalfields Limited (WCL), a Central Government undertaking, challenged the judgment of the Labour Court dated 5.5.2018, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Contract and Forfeiture of Earnest Money in Coal Transport Tender Dispute. Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind by Western Coalfields Limited Leads to Setting Aside of Order Cancelling Letter of Allotment and Debarment.

The petitioners, including a joint venture firm and its constituents, challenged an order dated 19.2.2014 passed by the respondents, Western Coalfield...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Imposition of Maximum Interest Rate on Delayed Royalty Payment Under Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. Court Holds That Rule 64-A Prescribes Maximum Rate, Not Mandatory Rate, and Respondents Have Discretion to Impose Lower Interest.

The petitioner, Associated Cement Companies Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 16/18.4.1996 from the respondents demandi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petitions Against Royalty Demands for Excavation During Building Construction Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Petitioners Argue Excavation Incidental to Permitted Construction Does Not Constitute Mining.

The Bombay High Court heard four writ petitions challenging the demand of royalty and penalty by revenue authorities for excavation carried out during...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Tender by Western Coalfields Limited. Tender cancellation upheld as employer has discretion to cancel tender before issuance of purchase order, and no concluded contract exists.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by successful bidders challenging the cancellation of a global tender issued by Western Coalfields Limi...