Search Results for "Summary suit"

1586 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1586 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Infructuous in Banking Matter Due to Transfer and Disposal of Original Suit by Debts Recovery Tribunal. Appeal arising from summary suit becomes infructuous when the original suit is transferred to and disposed of by the Debts Recovery Tribunal.

The appeal arose from a summary suit (Summary Suit No.2609 of 1992) filed by Punjab & Sind Bank and others. The appellants were original defendants No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Infructuous in Bank Recovery Suit — Suit Already Disposed of by Debts Recovery Tribunal. Appeal becomes infructuous when the underlying suit is transferred to and disposed of by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, leaving no live controversy.

The present appeal arose out of Summary Suit No.1860 of 1992 filed by Punjab & Sind Bank against the appellants and others. The suit was transferred t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Infructuous in Banking Dispute Due to Transfer of Suit to Debts Recovery Tribunal. Appeal becomes infructuous when the underlying summary suit is transferred to the Debts Recovery Tribunal and disposed of, leaving no live controversy.

The appeal arose from a summary suit filed by Punjab & Sind Bank against the appellants and others. During the pendency of the appeal, the suit was tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Prior Possession Within Six Months. The court held that the plaintiff did not establish possession within the statutory period, and the decree for possession was set aside.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the defendants (petitioners) against a decree passed by the 7th Joint Civil Judge, Jr. Divisio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Refusing to Strike Out Defence in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Held That Denial of Title by Tenant Without Supporting Evidence Does Not Attract Striking Out of Defence Under Order 15A CPC.

The case arises from a civil revision application filed by the defendants (M/s. Keshavdas Hassanand and others) against an order of the Trial Court re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit Due to Non-Service of Summons for Judgment. Defendants Granted Unconditional Leave to Defend as They Had Disclosed a Defence in Earlier Affidavit.

The plaintiff filed a summary suit against the defendants for recovery of a loan. The defendants filed an affidavit in reply to an attachment before j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment for Recovery of Goods Sold and Delivered in Commercial Dispute. Defendant's Failure to File Affidavit in Reply and Admission of Liability Leads to Decree Under Order XXXVII CPC.

The plaintiff, Dongreen Resins & Chemicals Private Limited, filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the d...