Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Infructuous in Bank Recovery Suit — Suit Already Disposed of by Debts Recovery Tribunal. Appeal becomes infructuous when the underlying suit is transferred to and disposed of by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, leaving no live controversy.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present appeal arose out of Summary Suit No.1860 of 1992 filed by Punjab & Sind Bank against the appellants and others. The suit was transferred to the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Mumbai, which disposed of the suit by judgment dated 14th January 2005. In view of this development, the High Court held that the appeal had become infructuous and disposed it of without any order as to costs. No arguments were advanced on behalf of the appellants as none appeared.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Appeal - Infructuous Appeal - Transfer of Suit to Debts Recovery Tribunal - Where the summary suit out of which the appeal arose was transferred to the Debts Recovery Tribunal and disposed of by judgment dated 14th January 2005, the appeal before the High Court became infructuous. The Court disposed of the appeal accordingly with no order as to costs. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal survives when the original suit has been transferred to and disposed of by the Debts Recovery Tribunal

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal disposed of as infructuous. No costs.

Law Points

  • Appeal becomes infructuous when the underlying suit is transferred and disposed of by another tribunal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (08) 10

Appeal No.1369 of 1996 in Summons for Judgment No.193 of 1994 in Summary Suit No.1860 of 1992

2005-08-02

R.M. Lodha, J.P. Devadhar

Mr.Rajan Jaykar for respondent No.1

Ashwin Kamdar and Lalit Goswami

Punjab & Sind Bank, Amar Bahadur Singh, Tejinder Singh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order in summary suit for recovery of debt by bank

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to challenge the order in Summons for Judgment No.193 of 1994

Filing Reason

Appeal filed against the order in the summary suit

Previous Decisions

Summary Suit No.1860 of 1992 was transferred to Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Mumbai and disposed of on 14th January 2005

Issues

Whether the appeal has become infructuous due to disposal of the original suit by the Debts Recovery Tribunal

Submissions/Arguments

Respondent-bank's counsel informed that the suit was transferred to DRT and disposed of, rendering the appeal infructuous

Ratio Decidendi

An appeal becomes infructuous when the underlying suit is transferred to and disposed of by another tribunal, leaving no live controversy for the appellate court to adjudicate.

Judgment Excerpts

We are informed by the learned counsel for the respondent-bank that Summary Suit No.1860 of 1992 out of which the present appeal arises was transferred to the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Mumbai. In view thereof, we find that the appeal has become infructuous. We dispose of the appeal accordingly. No costs.

Procedural History

Summary Suit No.1860 of 1992 was filed by Punjab & Sind Bank. Summons for Judgment No.193 of 1994 was taken out. Appeal No.1369 of 1996 was filed against the order in the summons for judgment. The suit was transferred to Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Mumbai, which disposed it on 14th January 2005. The High Court disposed the appeal as infructuous on 2nd August 2005.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Infructuous in Banking Recovery Case Due to Transfer of Suit to Debts Recovery Tribunal. Appeal Becomes Infructuous When Original Suit Is Transferred to DRT and Disposed of by Judgment Dated 14th January 2005.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Infructuous in Bank Recovery Suit — Suit Already Disposed of by Debts Recovery Tribunal. Appeal becomes infructuous when the underlying suit is transferred to and disposed of by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, lea...