Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment for Recovery of Goods Sold and Delivered in Commercial Dispute. Defendant's Failure to File Affidavit in Reply and Admission of Liability Leads to Decree Under Order XXXVII CPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, Dongreen Resins & Chemicals Private Limited, filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the defendant, M/s. Balaji Fiber Reinforce Pvt. Ltd., for recovery of Rs. 1,47,30,450/- along with interest at 21% per annum. The plaintiff supplied Polyester Resin ISO and Polyester Resin Ortho to the defendant pursuant to purchase orders dated 5 September 2011, 8 October 2011, and 19 December 2011, under 12 invoices totaling Rs. 1,95,79,951/-. The purchase orders provided for payment within 60 days from receipt of material, and the invoices stipulated interest at 24% per annum on overdue amounts. The defendant received the goods without objection. The plaintiff sent repeated emails demanding payment. On 13 December 2011, the defendant emailed the plaintiff admitting difficulty in making payments and requesting dispatch of material on replacement basis. The defendant made part payments totaling Rs. 48,49,501/-, leaving a balance of Rs. 1,47,30,450/-. The writ of summons was served on 4 July 2012, and the defendant's advocate filed a Vakalatnama on 11 July 2012. The summons for judgment was served on 29 August 2012, but the defendant filed no affidavit in reply. The court held that since the defendant failed to file an affidavit in reply and admitted the liability, there were no triable issues. The court rejected the defendant's oral request for unconditional leave to defend, noting that the defendant had ample opportunity to file a reply. The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff for Rs. 1,47,30,450/- with interest at 21% per annum from the date of the suit until payment, and costs.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Summary Suit - Order XXXVII Rule 2 CPC - Leave to Defend - Where defendant fails to file affidavit in reply and admits liability, no triable issues arise and plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment. (Paras 1-8)

B) Contract Law - Sale of Goods - Interest on Overdue Payments - Where invoices contain interest clause and goods are accepted without objection, defendant is liable to pay interest at the contracted rate. (Paras 3-4)

C) Evidence - Admission - Email Communication - An email admitting difficulty in making payment constitutes an admission of liability and receipt of goods. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the defendant is entitled to unconditional leave to defend the summary suit when no affidavit in reply is filed and the debt is admitted.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff for Rs. 1,47,30,450/- with interest at 21% per annum from the date of the suit until payment, and costs. The summons for judgment was made absolute.

Law Points

  • Summary suit
  • Order XXXVII CPC
  • unconditional leave to defend
  • admission of liability
  • interest on overdue payments
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (10) 198

Summons for Judgment No. 261 of 2012 in Summary Suit No. 1378 of 2012

2012-10-01

S.J. Kathawalla, J.

2012:BHC-OS:13841

Mr. Rohan Cama, instructed by M/s. Divya Shah Associates, for the Plaintiff; Mr. Kalpesh Joshi for the Defendant

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Summary suit for recovery of money due on sale of goods.

Remedy Sought

Decree for payment of Rs. 1,47,30,450/- with interest at 21% per annum and costs.

Filing Reason

Defendant failed to pay for goods supplied despite repeated demands.

Previous Decisions

None; the suit is at the stage of summons for judgment.

Issues

Whether the defendant is entitled to unconditional leave to defend the summary suit.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that defendant admitted liability and failed to file affidavit in reply, hence no triable issues. Defendant orally sought unconditional leave to defend but filed no affidavit.

Ratio Decidendi

In a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC, if the defendant fails to file an affidavit in reply and admits the liability, no triable issues arise and the plaintiff is entitled to judgment. The court may reject an oral request for leave to defend if the defendant had sufficient opportunity to file a reply.

Judgment Excerpts

The Defendant has admittedly received the goods along with the said invoices and have after receipt of the goods never objected to the aforementioned interest clause. On 13th December 2011, the Defendant admitted its difficulty in making payments and addressed an email to the Plaintiff... The Defendant has not filed any Affidavit in Reply to the Summons for Judgment. The Defendant has therefore not placed any material before this Court to show that it has a good or substantial defence to the suit.

Procedural History

Plaintiff filed Summary Suit No. 1378 of 2012. Writ of summons served on 4 July 2012. Defendant filed Vakalatnama on 11 July 2012. Summons for Judgment served on 29 August 2012. No affidavit in reply filed. Summons for Judgment heard on 1 October 2012 and made absolute.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XXXVII Rule 2
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professors' Writ Petition for Time-Bound Promotion. Court holds that the benefit of time-bound promotion under Government Resolution dated 15-04-1999 is available from the date of initial appointment, and denial by ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment for Recovery of Goods Sold and Delivered in Commercial Dispute. Defendant's Failure to File Affidavit in Reply and Admission of Liability Leads to Decree Under Order XXXVII CPC.