Search Results for "Slum Redevelopment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Slum Redevelopment"

287 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 287 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Redevelopment of Dilapidated Chawls — Upholds Enhanced Rehabilitation Area Under DCR 33(7) and DCR 33(9). The court held that occupants who had consented to redevelopment could not later resile, and the developer's offer of 300 sq. ft. plus 75 sq. ft. dry balcony was reasonable.

5 Dec 2012

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by seven residents acting for themselves and on behalf of 217 occupants of Haji Kasam Chawls, a ...

High Court

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the eviction order passed under Section 3E of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, for unauthorized transfer of a rehabilitation tenement. The Court held that the expression 'or otherwise' in Section 3E(1) is wide enough to include any arrangement by which the allottee parts with possession and control, even without a registered instrument.

31 Jul 2026

The dispute concerned a flat allotted to the petitioner under a slum rehabilitation scheme. The petitioner's name had been included in Annexure II as ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Decision to Terminate Developer for Non-Compliance. Court upholds SRA's power to cancel Letter of Intent and appoint new developer when original developer fails to fulfill obligations under Maharashtra Slum Areas (I.C. & R.) Act, 1971.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Advani Builders Pvt. Ltd. and its director Chirag P. Jain, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Slum Rehabilitation ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Writ Petition Challenging SRA Eviction Order — Petitioner Lacked Locus Standi as Non-Owner. Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Order to Hand Over Possession to Original Slum Dwellers Upheld Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

25 Jun 2019

The petitioner, Transcon-Sheth Creators Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition in the High Court...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Cross-Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matter — Power of Appellate Court Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Examined. The Court held that an appellate court under Section 37 cannot remand a Section 34 petition for fresh hearing but must decide the appeal on merits.

8 Jul 2024

The dispute arose from a development agreement concerning a slum rehabilitation scheme in Mumbai. The appellant, Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Termination of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Appointment — Upholds SRA's Power to Terminate Developer for Delay and Loss of Faith of Slum Dwellers. The court held that the CEO, SRA, validly exercised power under Section 32 of the Maharashtra Slums Act, 1971, and the termination was justified as the delay was attributable to the developer and the majority of slum dwellers had lost faith.

10 May 2024

The petitioner, a developer, challenged the termination of his appointment to implement a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme (SR Scheme) on a property owned b...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Separate Slum Rehabilitation Tenements; Holds Independent Structure Essential for Eligibility Under Regulation 33(10). Court Rules That Electoral Rolls Showing Separate Rooms Not Sufficient When Survey and Identity Cards Indicate Single Structure, Requiring One Tenement per Structure.

3 Mar 2005

The High Court of Bombay dismissed two writ petitions filed by occupants of a chawl in Ghatkopar seeking separate permanent alternative accommodation ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Society's Petition in Slum Rehabilitation Developer Termination Dispute — AGRC's Remand Order Set Aside. The Court held that the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee lacked jurisdiction to interfere with the CEO's order under Section 13(2) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, and restored the termination of the developer.

22 Mar 2024

The Petitioner, Shiv Sai (SRA) Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., challenged an order dated 4 October 2023 passed by the Apex Grievance Redressal Comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Slum Rehabilitation Area Declaration Where No Show Cause Notice Was Issued. The Court Examines Whether Principles of Natural Justice Require Opportunity of Hearing Before Section 3C(1) Declaration Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

11 May 2011

This writ petition was filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the declaration of certain property as a Slum Rehabilitation Area under Section 3C(1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Ex-Parte SRA Order Deleting Slum Dweller's Name and Upholds Right to Permanent Alternate Accommodation. Court Held That Supplementary Annexure II Issued Without Hearing Was Invalid, and Petitioner is Entitled to Independent Rehab Tenement Under Slum Rehabilitation Scheme.

24 Jul 2012

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Hushna Bano Mohamed Shakir Shaikh challenging an ex-parte order dated 9 ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)