Search Results for "Securitisation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Securitisation"

417 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 417 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Asset Reconstruction Company's Petition Against DRT Interim Relief in SARFAESI Act Case — Assignment of Debt by IIFL Upheld. The court set aside the DRT and DRAT orders granting ad-interim relief restraining the petitioner from taking steps in respect of secured assets under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, as the tribunals failed to consider the validity of the assignment and the balance of convenience.

18 Jan 2023

The petitioner, ASREC (India) Ltd., an Asset Reconstruction Company, challenged the order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dated 2 June 2022 granti...

High Court

High Court Validates DRAT Order for Pre-Deposit Calculation in Secured Asset Auction Dispute. Pre-deposit determination upheld as per SARFAESI Act, focusing on "debt due" over auction value.

19 Dec 2024

The Bombay High Court upheld the DRAT's order mandating a pre-deposit based on "debt due" when the measures under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act we...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Substitution of Assignee in Pending DRT Proceedings Under SARFAESI Act. Assignment of debt under Section 5 of SARFAESI Act entitles assignee to continue pending recovery proceedings without fresh filing, and amendment of cause title is permissible.

9 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Alpha and Omega Diagnostics India Ltd., challenged a common order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which upheld the orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Pre-deposit Condition Under SARFAESI Act — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 18 Provisos. The court held that the legislature may condition the right of appeal and the provisions are not discriminatory compared to the RDB Act.

1 Jul 2011

The petitioners, National Polymers and others, challenged an order dated 6 April 2011 of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal directing them to depos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal Against Refusal to Reject Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Holds Suit Not Barred by Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. Plaintiffs, Claiming Independent Rights as Co-owners and Not Being Parties to Loan/Mortgage Transaction, Could Not Be Barred Under Section 34 as Their Suit Challenges Mortgage Validity Only Against Their Share, Not the Securitization Process Itself.

8 Dec 2010

The dispute arose from a loan transaction between State Bank of India (appellant/first defendant) and Crosslink Shipbreakers (P) Ltd. (principal borro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case, Restoring Interim Order for Sale of Mortgaged Property. The Court held that the interim order directing steps for sale without final orders was warranted to protect the secured creditor's rights under Section 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as the respondent had defaulted on credit facilities.

18 Apr 2023

The appeal arose from a dispute between Punjab & Sind Bank (appellant) and M/s Frontline Corporation Ltd. (respondent) concerning the sale of mortgage...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Magistrate to Implement SARFAESI Order for Bank Possession. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Bound to Execute Section 14 Order for Taking Physical Possession of Secured Assets with Police Assistance.

10 Jun 2011

The petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a banking company as defined in Clause 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, filed a criminal writ petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Predeposit Condition for Appeal Against Interlocutory Order Under SARFAESI Act. Section 18(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002 Requires Deposit of 50% of Debt for Any Appeal Under Section 17, Including Interlocutory Orders, and Appellate Tribunal May Reduce to 25%.

16 Nov 2010

The petitioners, M/s Vinay Container Services Pvt. Ltd. and its guarantors, challenged an order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against SARFAESI Proceedings — Tenant's Claim Not Established. The court held that the appellant failed to prove tenancy and that the remedy under Section 17 of the Securitisation Act is available to any person aggrieved, including tenants.

14 Feb 2020

The appellant, Modinasab Indikar, filed a first appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa against the order of the District Magistrate, Salcete, d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes DRAT Order Waiving Pre-deposit in SARFAESI Appeal — Mandatory Deposit Under Section 18(1) Cannot Be Waived Without Recording Exceptional Hardship. Cooperative Bank's Right to Enforce Security Interest Upheld as Secured Creditor Under SARFAESI Act.

9 Dec 2011

The petitioner, Godavari Laxmi Co-operative Bank Ltd., a cooperative bank, had issued a notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstru...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)