Search Results for "Rule 421"

304 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 304 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Insolvency Case Due to Limitation and Mis-statements. NCLAT's Refusal to Condon Delay Upheld as Appellant Failed to Apply for Certified Copies and Made Contradictory Assertions Under Section 61 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The appeals arose from an order dated 18.01.2024 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), which dismissed appeals preferred by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Recovery of Contractual Dues from Private Company. Disputed Questions of Fact Regarding Outstanding Amount Under Housekeeping Contract Cannot Be Adjudicated Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Fancy Rehabilitation Trust and its Managing Trustee, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking rec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order on Burden of Proof in Partition Suit — Defendants Claiming Under Gift Deed Must Prove Its Validity First. No Exceptional Circumstances to Shift Onus to Co-Defendants Under Order 18 Rule 2 CPC.

The case arises from a partition suit filed by the plaintiffs (respondent no.1 and others) in the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Malegaon, seeking part...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Transfer of Employees from Municipal Corporation to State Government. Transfer of employees under Section 451 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 held valid as in public interest and for better administration.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) challenging their transfer to the Sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Upholds Preferential Transaction Findings in Insolvency Case — Two Transactions Totaling Rs. 1.60 Crore Held as Preferential Under Section 43 of IBC, 2016. The Tribunal Confirms That Payments Made to Related Parties During the Look-Back Period Are Voidable and Must Be Reversed.

The case involves an appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, filed by H.P. Arun Kumar, C.M. Nagaraj, and Usha (Appellants...