Search Results for "Reservation benefit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Reservation benefit"

1149 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1149 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. Land reserved for cooperative society extension deemed lapsed under Sections 126 and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

13 Jan 2005

The petitioner, Ramchandra Balwant Talange and others, owned survey no. 907 in Miraj city. On 26-04-1979, the Town Planning Authority reserved this la...

High Court

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Examines Fee Reimbursement Scheme Restriction for Minority Institution Students. Court Tasked with Resolving Conflicting Precedents on Whether Limiting Reimbursement to CAP-Admitted Students Is Discriminatory.

29 May 2020

The case concerned a challenge to a Government Resolution (GR) dated 27.02.2013 issued by the State of Maharashtra, which restricted fee reimbursement...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for De-reservation of Land Reserved for High School and Playground in Development Plan. Petitioners failed to show that reservation had lapsed under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966 as no notice under Section 127 was issued.

21 Sep 2005

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.99 (now 99-A) and site Nos.142 and 145 at Malegaon, District Nasik, filed a writ petition seeking de...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellants in Reservation Eligibility Dispute Under Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000. Appellants, originally from unified Bihar and residing in Jharkhand post-reorganisation, are entitled to Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe/Other Backward Classes reservation benefits in Jharkhand as ordinary residents, not migrants, under Articles 341(1) and 342(1) of the Constitution and Sections 23, 24, 73, 74 of Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000.

19 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions challenging a High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 24th February...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Reserved Category Candidate Who Availed Age Relaxation: Cannot Claim General Category Seat. Age Relaxation Under Gujarat Policy Is a Relaxation in Standard, Not a Mere Concession, and Candidates Availing It Must Be Adjusted Against Reserved Posts.

4 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Niravkumar Dilipbhai Makwana against the Gujarat Public Service Commission and others, upholding the D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Horizontal Reservation Filling Rules and Migration of Reserved Category Candidates to General Category Seats. Court Considers Challenge to Government Circular Permitting Reserved Category Candidates to Compete for Unreserved Seats on Merit.

8 Aug 2019

The judgment from the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) addressed a group of writ petitions concerning the proper method for filling vacancies unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Article 226 Declaring Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 MRTP Act. Petitioner's land reserved for Public Health Center in Sangamner Development Plan deemed released as Municipal Council failed to acquire within ten years of purchase notice.

10 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Sumanbai Uttam Gadekar, is the owner of land bearing Gut No.179 (Hissa No.1+9B/A) old Survey No.759 situated at Sangamner, District Ah...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Housing Allotment Case Over Scheduled Tribe Reservation. The Court upheld the lower courts' decrees, ruling that reservation benefits under Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution of India are confined to the State or Union Territory of origin, and migrants cannot claim such benefits in another jurisdiction without a corresponding Presidential Order.

7 Feb 2024

The dispute arose from an advertisement dated 28.06.1983 by the Chandigarh Housing Board, calling for applications for allotment of houses with reserv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking EWS Quota Benefit for Lateral Entry in B.Pharm Course. Rule 13(h) of Information Brochure does not provide for EWS reservation at institutional level for direct second year admission.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioners, Dattakala College of Pharmacy and two students (Yash A Gandhi and Athrava C Ghadyalji), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Government's Insistence on Reservation of Tenements Under Urban Land Ceiling Act Scheme. Scheme Sanctioned Under Section 21 of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 for Weaker Sections; Government's Demand for 10% Reservation of Built-Up Area for Its Nominees Held Unenforceable After Scheme Implementation.

7 Apr 2005

The 1st petitioner, Pratapsingh R. Pardeshi, was the owner of a property bearing survey no.119+204+205+206/1+209/1, plot no.5, situated at Lohegaon, T...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)