Search Results for "Regular Promotion"

591 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 591 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Antedated Promotion and Seniority Revision for Municipal Employee. Petitioner's claim for deemed promotion date from 2008 rejected due to pending disciplinary proceedings and subsequent penalty.

The petitioner, Himmat Dalichand Mali, an employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) belonging to the Vimukta Jati category, filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Seniority and Promotion Rights in Service Regularization Dispute - Continuity of Service Entitles Counting of Retrenched Period for Promotion Without Monetary Benefits Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The dispute originated from the appointments of the respondents as Assistant Managers on contract in 2000, which were regularized in 2006 under the Ke...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in MACP Scheme Financial Upgradation Dispute. Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Entitles Employees to Next Higher Grade Pay, Not Grade Pay of Next Promotional Post.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against orders of various High Courts and Central Administrative Tribunals...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Teacher Promotion Case — C&V Teachers Not Entitled to TGT Quota for Headmaster Post. Rule 9(5) of Haryana School Education (Group C) State Cadre Service Rules, 2012 only gives notional conversion to TGT cadre, not eligibility for promotion against TGT quota.

The State of Haryana appealed against a Division Bench order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which had allowed writ petitions filed by Sandeep Si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Regularisation of Ad-hoc Promotion in Konkan Railway. No Legal Right Established Without Rules or Policy.

The petitioner, Sreekumar G., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking to quash an order dated 28.06.2013 and to declare that his ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Seniority in CGHS Promotion Dispute. Seniority Determined by Date of Regular Appointment, Not Ad Hoc Promotion, Under Central Civil Services Rules.

The petitioner, Arjun Sopan Gaikwad, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk on 16 October 1978 and promoted to Upper Division Clerk on 9 April 1984. ...