Search Results for "Real Estate Developers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Real Estate Developers"

382 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 382 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute. Developer Granted Interim Relief to Take Possession of Tenements from Non-Cooperating Members Pending Arbitration Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

22 Dec 2016

The Petitioner, M/s. R.R.B. Realtors Pvt. Ltd., a real estate developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Orders Forensic Audit and Status Quo in Real Estate Project Dispute Over Fund Siphoning Allegations. The Court Approved Forensic Audit Findings That the Amrapali Group Controlled the La-Residentia Project and Diverted Buyer Funds, Leading to Interim Relief for Apartment Buyers Under Writ Petition (Civil) No. 940 of 2017.

29 Jun 2022

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil original jurisdiction matter, addressed a dispute concerning the Amrapali La-Residentia real estate project. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal Against Arbitrator's Refusal of Interim Relief in Development Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion under Section 17 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or perversity in order denying interim injunction to developer under Development Agreement dated 3/2/2018.

5 Apr 2023

The petitioner, M/s Viraj Kamman Real Estate Developers Pvt Ltd, a real estate development company, entered into a Development Agreement dated 3/2/201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admits Second Appeal in RERA Refund Case on Substantial Questions of Law Regarding Consent for Extension of Possession Date and Application of Section 62 of Indian Contract Act. The appeal challenges the Appellate Tribunal's order upholding refund under Section 18 RERA, raising issues of novation of contract and consent of allottees.

2 May 2022

The present appeal is filed under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) by Jayesh Tanna, Director of ITMC Develo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Claim for 50% Concession on Premium Under Covid-19 Rebate Scheme — Government Resolution dated 14.01.2021 Held Applicable to Projects with Pending Premium Payments Despite Prior Commencement Certificates

23 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Macrotech Developers Limited, a developer, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that it is entitled to a 50% concession on the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Injunction Application in Redevelopment Dispute and Holds Civil Suit Not Barred by Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Developer's Claim for Specific Performance of Development Agreement Against Co-operative Housing Society Held Maintainable as Developer Is Not a Member Under Section 91, and Transaction Not Subject to Restrictions Under Sections 43, 44, or 45.

13 Jul 2016

The suit was filed by a partnership firm of developers, Maya Developers, against the Azad Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and its members, seeking s...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Refund to Flat Purchaser for Inordinate Delay in Possession — Builder's Unfair Contract Terms Not Binding. Builder's failure to apply for occupancy certificate within stipulated time constitutes deficiency of service; one-sided clauses in Apartment Buyer's Agreement are unfair and not binding under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

2 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. against orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commi...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes RERA Authority's Refund Order Against Builder for Lack of Jurisdiction as Project Was Completed Before RERA Act Came Into Force. The Court held that the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 applies only to ongoing projects where completion certificate is not issued, and since partial occupancy certificate was issued prior to the Act, the complaint was not maintainable and the order was without jurisdiction.

2 Jan 2023

The case arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by M/s Provident Housing Limited, a real estate deve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Enforcement of RERA Order and Grants Interim Relief of Deposit and Injunction Against Developer. RERA Order Directing Refund of Investment with Interest Must Be Complied With by Revenue Authorities and Developer.

15 Jul 2021

The petitioner, Rustam Phiroze Mehta, filed a writ petition seeking enforcement of an order dated 15th April 2019 passed by the Maharashtra Real Estat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioner's failure to obtain 70% slum dweller consent and submit documents within stipulated time justified termination under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

9 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Surjit Singh Arora, sole proprietor of M/s. Sukhamani Construction, was appointed as developer for a slum rehabilitation scheme under ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)