Search Results for "Purchase Certificates"

328 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 328 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 as Valid Regulatory Legislation. High Court erred in striking down entire Act; provisions conflicting with UGC Act are severable.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment striking down the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Seeking DRC in BBMP Land Acquisition Case — Petitioners Failed to Establish Entitlement to Development Rights Certificate Under KTCP Act, 1961.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Time was of the essence in the agreement for sale dated 25.04.2007, and the plaintiff did not demonstrate continuous readiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract.

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 25.04.2007 between the plaintiff (appellant) and the defendant (r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Tenancy Dispute — Section 32M Certificate Conclusive Proof of Ownership. Certificate issued under Section 32M of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is conclusive evidence of tenant's purchase and civil court cannot ignore it.

The appellant, Pushpalata Narayan Thorbole, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 1.4.2014 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Orders Under SC/ST Act in Land Dispute — Caste Certificate Validity Not Required for Initiating Proceedings Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging orders passed by the Assistant C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Orders Under SC/ST Act and Karnataka PTCL Act in Land Dispute. Upholds Concurrent Findings of Violation of Rights and Prohibition of Transfer of Land Belonging to Scheduled Caste Person.

The case involves three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed by the Assistant Commis...