Search Results for "Pension Regulations 1961"

74 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 74 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal of Contract Labourer Seeking Absorption from 1992 and Half-Service Counting. Seniority among contract labourers does not arise for absorption; delay in absorption due to verification does not entitle retrospective regularization.

The appellant, T. Sivaraman, filed a Writ Appeal against the order dated 19.09.2022 in W.P.No.25469 of 2016, wherein his claim for absorption on par w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tata Memorial Centre's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Finding on Appropriate Government. State Government Held as Appropriate Government for Autonomous Body Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, Making Union's Complaint Maintainable.

The Bombay High Court dismissed four writ petitions filed by Tata Memorial Centre (TMC) challenging decisions of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Disability Pension Case for Air Force Officer with Less Than 20% Disability. Regulation 37(a) of Defence Service Regulations Pension Regulations for the Air Force, 1961 bars disability pension for disabilities below 20% even if aggravated by service.

The Union of India appealed against an order of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) which had granted disability pension to Wing Commander S.P. Rathore, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Invalidation Pension Due to Delay and Laches. Sepoy-Driver's Disability Claim Rejected as Not Attributable to Military Service.

The petitioner, Moreshwar Bhalchandra Deshpande, joined the Indian Army as a Sepoy-Driver on 4th February 1981 and was posted in difficult terrains in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...