Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Invalidation Pension Due to Delay and Laches. Sepoy-Driver's Disability Claim Rejected as Not Attributable to Military Service.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 77
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Moreshwar Bhalchandra Deshpande, joined the Indian Army as a Sepoy-Driver on 4th February 1981 and was posted in difficult terrains in Jammu and Kashmir. He developed psycho fear, was hospitalized multiple times, and was invalidated from service on 5th July 1985. He made a representation for invalidation pension, which was turned down. The last date for filing an internal appeal was 18th June 1986, but it was not entertained. The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2003, nearly 18 years after his discharge. The court held that the petition was barred by delay and laches, and the disability was not attributable to military service. The petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Invalidation Pension - Delay and Laches - Pension Regulations for the Army 1961 - Petitioner, a Sepoy-Driver, claimed invalidation pension for psycho fear developed during service in difficult terrains - Petition filed in 2003, nearly 18 years after discharge in 1985 - Held that the claim is hopelessly barred by delay and laches, and the disability was not attributable to military service (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to invalidation pension for disability claimed to have arisen during military service, and whether the petition is barred by delay and laches.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Delay and laches
  • Invalidation pension
  • Disability attributable to military service
  • Pension Regulations for the Army 1961
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (07) 11

Writ Petition No.2560 of 2003

2006-07-14

H.L. Gokhale, J.H. Bhatia

Mr.V.S. Talkute for petitioner, Mr.Anil Singh with Ms.Rutuja Ambekar for respondents 1 to 4

Moreshwar Bhalchandra Deshpande

Government of India & ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking invalidation pension for disability claimed to have arisen during military service.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought invalidation pension from the respondents.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's representation for invalidation pension was turned down, and internal appeal was not entertained.

Previous Decisions

Representation for pension turned down; internal appeal not entertained.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to invalidation pension for disability claimed to have arisen during military service. Whether the petition is barred by delay and laches.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he developed psycho fear due to continuous driving in difficult terrains and was invalidated from service. Respondents contended that the disability was not attributable to military service and the petition is barred by delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The claim for invalidation pension is barred by delay and laches as the petition was filed nearly 18 years after discharge, and the disability was not attributable to military service.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner herein claims a pension for invalidation after a short service in the Armed Forces. He was invalidated from his service and was discharged from 5th July 1985. The petition was filed in 2003, nearly 18 years after the discharge.

Procedural History

Petitioner joined service on 4th February 1981, discharged on 5th July 1985. Representation for pension turned down. Internal appeal not entertained by 18th June 1986. Writ petition filed in 2003.

Acts & Sections

  • Pension Regulations for the Army 1961:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Erroneous Deduction of Personal Expenses and Incorrect Multiplier Application. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.3,36,850 to Rs.5,23,600 for Death of 25-Year-Old Bachelor in Head-On Collisio...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Invalidation Pension Due to Delay and Laches. Sepoy-Driver's Disability Claim Rejected as Not Attributable to Military Service.