KAHC010131542020_1
22 Apr 2024The matter arose from two writ petitions filed by M/s. Chamundeshwari Electricity Supply Corporation Limited, a Government company engaged in electric...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961"
408 result(s) found
Found 408 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Public Interest Litigation Challenging CIDCO's Land Allotment to Private Developer in Navi Mumbai Under MRTP Act. Alleged Violations Include Absence of Open Tender, Lack of Government Approval for FSI Enhancement, and Unauthorized Land Use Conversion in Sector 30A Vashi, Under Sections 113, 154 and New Bombay Disposal of Lands Regulations, 1975.
21 Nov 2014The case pertains to two public interest litigations filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bomba...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Denial of Industrial Park Scheme Benefits. Interpretation of Section 80IA(4)(iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961 and Industrial Park Scheme 2002 requires strict compliance with conditions for deduction.
16 Nov 2011The petitioners, M/s. Silver Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order da...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Application in Industrial Dispute Case — M/s. Bella Vista Drycleaners v. Vishwanath Kanojia & Ors. The Court set aside the Industrial Court's order rejecting amendment of written statement, holding that the Industrial Court failed to exercise jurisdiction under Section 30 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
2 Dec 2025The applicant, M/s. Bella Vista Drycleaners, filed a Civil Revision Application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order da...
- 235
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Draft Development Plan Publication and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Allege Irregularities in Municipal Corporation's Substitution of Plan and Ex Post Facto Extension Under Section 26.
5 Aug 2016The matter pertains to a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the notification dated 04.02.2016 published under S...
- 62
Supreme Court
"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"
25 Jul 2024The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...
- 505
High Court
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.
3 Aug 2017This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Reference on Whether Mathadi Act Applies Only to Casually Engaged Workers; Considers Statutory Definition of Unprotected Worker Under Section 2(11)
30 Aug 2006Background: A group of writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various employers including Kay Kay Embroideries P. Ltd., Bhulwalka S...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges claimed by MIDC.
26 Jul 2018The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the sale of two industrial plots allotted by MIDC to Transpower Engineering Ltd. (...
- 136
