Search Results for "Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act 1993"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act 1993"

57 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Shiksha Karmis in Bias and Natural Justice Conflict. Breach of Audi Alteram Partem Cured by Revisional Hearing Where No Actual Bias Proved Under Section 40(c) of Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993.

27 Jan 2025

The case involves four civil appeals arising from a split verdict of the Supreme Court regarding the validity of appointments of Shiksha Karmi (Grade ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Postponement in Gram Panchayats Due to COVID-19 Pandemic. State Election Commission's Decision to Postpone Elections Based on Government Notification and Pandemic Conditions Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Article 243K of the Constitution of India and Section 308 of the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

18 Nov 2021

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the decision of the State Election Commissi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Vice President — Motion Valid Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Notice of Motion Properly Served and Motion Carried by Majority of Members.

26 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Sri R. Chandrahasa, a member of Kesturu Gram Panchayat, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Gram Panchayat President Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Notice Issued on 15.02.2019 for Meeting on 27.02.2019 Violates the 15-Day Requirement.

22 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Sri S Thippeswamy, was the President of Chennammanagathihally Grama Panchayat. The respondents, including the Assistant Commissioner a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Chairman for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Period Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the 15-day notice period is mandatory and failure to comply renders the motion invalid.

12 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Smt. S. Palakshamma, was the Chairman of Marashettihalli Gram Panchayat. The respondents, including the Assistant Commissioner and sev...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against No-Confidence Motion in Grama Panchayat — President Failed to Show Procedural Violation Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court upheld the Single Judge's dismissal of the writ petition challenging the no-confidence motion, as no procedural irregularity was established.

29 May 2019

The appellant, Sri Abdul Khaleel, was elected as President (Adhyaksha) of Kamasamudram Grama Panchayat on 15 July 2015. In December 2018, a no-confide...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period was not complied with, rendering the no-confidence motion and resolution invalid.

12 Dec 2018

The petitioner, Sri Harisha I.E., was the President of Ichanahally Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was moved against him by the respondents, wh...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in APMC License Cancellation Case — Upholds Single Judge's Order Refusing to Interfere with Cancellation of License for Non-Compliance with Bye-Laws. Licensee Failed to Establish Valid License and Was Not Entitled to Relief Under Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966.

14 May 2018

The case involves two intra-Court appeals filed by Sri Chitturi Durga Rao and Nirmala Bagodi against a common order dated 13.12.2017 passed by a learn...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeals in APMC License Cancellation Case — No Interference with Concurrent Findings of Fact. The court upheld the Single Judge's dismissal of writ petitions challenging license cancellation by the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, finding no perversity or error of law.

14 May 2018

The case involves two intra-Court appeals (W.A. Nos. 6870/2017 and 6871/2017) filed by Sri Chitturi Durga Rao and Nirmala Bagodi respectively, against...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Deputy Commissioner to Consider Representations for Division of Panchayat Assets Under Section 118(2) of Karnataka Grama Swaraj and Panchayath Raj Act, 1993. The court deprecated litigation between two Grama Panchayaths over allocation of public funds and assets, holding that the Deputy Commissioner must decide on the division of assets and liabilities as per the statute.

15 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Ayanur Grama Panchayath, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Depu...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)