Search Results for "Income tax refund"

622 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 622 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund Claim Under CGST Act Despite Previous Sanction for Overlapping Period. Second refund application for a specific month within a previously covered quarter is maintainable as the earlier sanction did not adjudicate the claim for that month.

The petitioner, Valmet Flow Control Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 3 April...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 2320 OF 2018

The matter arises from a writ petition filed by Mandhana Industries Ltd, a public limited company engaged in textile manufacturing, against an order o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Pre-deposit in VAT Matter — Mandamus Issued for Release of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and Interest on Delayed Refund. Petitioner entitled to refund of pre-deposit amount with interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s. Flipkart India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for TCS in Income Tax Case — Lack of Fresh Material and Change of Opinion. Reopening under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 invalid as reasons recorded were based on same material considered during original assessment, constituting mere change of opinion.

The petitioner, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., challenged a notice dated 31st March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Refund of Excess Recovery in Income Tax Stay Matter — Petitioner Voluntarily Paid 20% Demand, Revenue Adjusted Refund Beyond Permitted Limit. Adjustment of Refund Against Stayed Demand Violates Instruction No.1914 and Stay Order Dated 17 April 2024.

The petitioner, an individual, filed his return of income for assessment year 2015-2016 on 28 September 2015, declaring income of Rs.56,65,660/-. The ...