High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Pre-deposit in VAT Matter — Mandamus Issued for Release of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and Interest on Delayed Refund. Petitioner entitled to refund of pre-deposit amount with interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. Flipkart India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent, the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, to release the refund of the balance pre-deposit amount of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- in cash or otherwise, and to release interest on the refund of Rs. 6,90,51,900/- and Rs. 16,11,19,226/- from the date of deposit till the date of payment. The petition was heard and reserved on 16.04.2025 and pronounced on 16.07.2025. The court, after considering the submissions, allowed the petition and directed the respondents to refund the balance pre-deposit amount with interest as per law.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Refund of Pre-deposit - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Petitioner sought direction to release balance pre-deposit amount of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and interest on refunds - Court held that the respondents are liable to refund the pre-deposit amount with interest as per law - Held that the petitioner is entitled to the relief sought (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to refund of the balance pre-deposit amount of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and interest on the refund of Rs. 6,90,51,900/- and Rs. 16,11,19,226/- from the date of deposit till payment.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to refund the balance pre-deposit amount of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- with interest as per law.

Law Points

  • Refund of pre-deposit
  • Interest on delayed refund
  • Mandamus
  • Article 226
  • Karnataka Value Added Tax Act
  • 2003
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (07) 44

WP No. 7277 of 2025 (T-RES)

2025-07-16

S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

SRI. TARUN GULATI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. PRADEEP NAYAK, SRI. SANKEERTH VITAL, SRI.KISHORE KUNAL, SRI.PRANAAM CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATES; SRI. K. HEMA KUMAR, AGA

M/S. FLIPKART INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking refund of pre-deposit amount and interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks direction to respondent No.1 to release refund of balance pre-deposit amount of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and interest on refund of Rs. 6,90,51,900/- and Rs. 16,11,19,226/- from date of deposit till payment.

Filing Reason

Non-refund of pre-deposit amount and interest by the tax authorities.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to refund of the balance pre-deposit amount of Rs. 16,11,19,226/-? Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest on the refund of Rs. 6,90,51,900/- and Rs. 16,11,19,226/- from the date of deposit till payment?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the respondents are liable to refund the pre-deposit amount with interest as per law. Respondents opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to refund of the pre-deposit amount with interest, and a writ of mandamus can be issued under Article 226 to direct the authorities to release the refund.

Judgment Excerpts

In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs: (a) Issue a writ of mandamus... directing the Respondent No.1 to release refund of the balance amount of pre-deposit to the Petitioner amounting to Rs.16,11,19,226/- in cash or otherwise; (b) Issue a Writ of mandamus... directing the Respondent No.1 to release interest on the refund of Rs.6,90,51,900/- and Rs.16,11,19,226/- from the date of deposit till the date of payment.

Procedural History

The petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, heard and reserved on 16.04.2025, and pronounced on 16.07.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Duty Case Due to Statutory Interpretation. Levy Under Bihar Electricity Duty Act 1948 Not Applicable as Supply Was to Licensee, Not Consumer as Defined Under Sections 2(b) and 2(ee).
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Kidnapping Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Evidence Found Inconsistent and Recovery Not Proved, Leading to Benefit of Doubt Under Sections 302 and 364 of Indian Penal Code, 186...