Search Results for "Hypothecation Agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Hypothecation Agreement"

126 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Financial Dispute Over Hypothecated Assets. Court allows appointment of Receiver under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to preserve assets pending arbitration.

9 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Vivriti Capital Limited, filed Arb.O.P.No.720 of 2025 under Section 11(6)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ap...

High Court

Madras High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Financial Dispute. Court Allows Appointment of Receiver to Secure Hypothecated Assets Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Vivriti Capital Limited, filed three applications before the Madras High Court: Arb.O.P.No.720 of 2025 under Section 11(6)(a) of the A...

High Court

Challenge to Arbitral Award on Valuation Grounds: Court Considers Admission and Unconditional Stay. A petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act questions an award's reliance on an unproven valuation report, citing procedural lapses and natural justice violations.

13 Jun 2024

The petition challenges an arbitral award dated November 23, 2023, under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The award directed ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Upholds Consumer Fora Orders for Compensation. Ownership of Vehicle Not Transferred Despite Sale Agreement; Insurer Liable to Pay Claim Amount with Interest.

18 Jun 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Surendra Kumar Bhilawe against The New India Assurance Company Limited, setting aside the National Commi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Challenge to Pledge of Shares During Lock-In Period — Pledge Held Valid as Lock-In Restricts Transfer of Title, Not Interest. Court Rules That Pledge Under Section 172 of Contract Act Does Not Violate SEBI ICDR Regulations, 2009.

5 Nov 2014

The plaintiff, Kannan Vishwanath, a promoter and managing director of Dr. Datson Labs Limited, filed a suit and notice of motion seeking a declaration...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act to Secure Claim of Lender Against Defaulting Borrower and Guarantors. The court held that where a borrower defaults and fails to disclose assets, appointment of receiver is necessary to prevent the arbitral award from becoming a paper decree.

7 Jan 2014

The petitioner, L&T Finance Limited, filed an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Maharashtra Tax on Lotteries, Betting and Gambling Act, 2006 — Levy on Entry Fee for Games of Skill and Chance Upheld. The Court held that the tax on entry fee for games like poker, rummy, and bridge is a valid compensatory tax under Entry 62 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India.

10 Apr 2012

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Tax on Lotteries, Betting and Gambling Act,...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Loan Recovery Case — Suit for Recovery of Loan Secured by Registered Charge Governed by Article 62 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court held that a suit for recovery of loan secured by a registered charge on property is governed by Article 62 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which provides a 12-year limitation period from the date the money becomes due, and not by Article 19 or 37.

13 Feb 2006

The appellant, State Bank of India, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 16,179.49 against the respondents, Ramkrishna and Himmatrao Sakharkar, based on a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Pre-Deposit Condition for Appeal Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 — Section 21 Mandates Deposit of 75% of Debt Amount Before Entertaining Appeal. The Court declined to interfere with the Appellate Tribunal's order directing 50% deposit, as the order was within the Tribunal's discretion and the petitioners had an alternative remedy.

12 Aug 2005

The petitioners, Ashish Mines & Minerals and others, were borrowers who had availed credit facilities from the Central Bank of India in 1985, includin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Financial Institution to Recover Debt Under IRBI Act, 1984 — Rejects Borrower's Challenge to Section 13(1) Notice. Court holds that notice under Section 13(1) of the Industrial Reconstruction Bank of India Act, 1984 is valid and enforceable, and the borrower's objections regarding limitation and non-compliance are not sustainable.

7 Jun 2005

The petitioner, Industrial Investment Bank of India Ltd., a financial institution under the Industrial Reconstruction Bank of India Act, 1984, filed a...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)