Search Results for "Fee Committee Constitution"

664 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 664 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds CAT Order Directing Reimbursement of Tuition Fee to OBC Candidate in Railway Recruitment — Non-production of Income Certificate Not Fatal When Candidate Belongs to Non-Creamy Layer.

The Union of India and the Railway Recruitment Board filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Bengalu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Addresses Challenge to National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) Notifications for Medical Admissions. The court examines the regulatory power of medical councils and the impact on minority educational institutions under Articles 19(1)(g) and 30 of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of writ petitions and transferred cases challenging four notifications issued by the Medical Council of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Refund of Court Fees in Suit Settled Through Mediation Under Section 89 CPC. Court Holds That Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Does Not Mandate Refund Upon Settlement Through Alternative Dispute Resolution.

The petitioner, Sanjeevkumar Harakchand Kankariya, entered into an agreement to sell immovable property with respondents No.3 and 4. When the agreemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the Process Invalid.

The petitioners, Sopanrao Sathe (Chairman) and the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Malkapur, challenged a notification dated 17-01-2009 ...