Search Results for "Family Court Pune"

1675 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1675 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Maintainability of Application Under Section 20 DV Act in Specific Relief Act Suit; Relying on Section 26, Court Holds Such Monetary Relief Can Be Sought in Any Pending Legal Proceeding

The dispute arose from a matrimonial conflict between the husband and wife, married in 1997, with two children. The wife had filed Petition B No.2/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Allegations of Cruelty Were Vague and Desertion Not Proven, Affirming Family Court's Dismissal of Divorce Petition.

The appellant-husband filed a petition under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, challenging the Family Court, Pune's order dated 18 July 2000...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 498-A IPC Against Husband and In-Laws in Matrimonial Discord Case. Allegations of Cruelty Fail Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Abuse of Process of Law

The Applicants, including the husband and his family members, filed a criminal application seeking quashing of an FIR registered under Section 498-A r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Son's Challenge Against Impleadment of Parents in Property Suit — Order Directing Addition of Parents as Parties Set Aside. Court holds that parents have no independent right to be impleaded in son's suit for possession against third parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioner, Parag Prakash Mutha, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 10 January 2022 passed by the 7th Additional Judge, Small Causes...