Search Results for "Court Fees"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Court Fees"

4448 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4448 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Decrees Ownership of 800 ITC Shares to Plaintiffs, Finding Transfers Forged and Broker's Claim Unproven. Defendant No.14 Failed to Discharge Burden Under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and Forged Transfer Deeds Are Void; Register of Members Ordered to Be Rectified.

3 Aug 2011

The suit concerned a declaration of ownership and rectification of the register of members of ITC Ltd. (Defendant No.1) in respect of 800 shares. Plai...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Court Fee Valuation Dispute: Circle Rate Not Conclusive for Market Value Under Section 7(iv-A) of Court Fees Act. The Court held that the market value for court fee purposes must be determined based on pleadings and evidence, not merely the circle rate fixed by the Collector.

19 Feb 2020

The appellant, Agra Diocesan Trust Association, filed two suits (O.S. 24/2013 and O.S. 25/2013) in the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Advocate's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Court Fee Stamps. Section 52B of Bombay Stamps Act, 1958 Held Inapplicable to Court Fee Stamps Under Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

9 Jan 2006

The petitioner, a practicing advocate, filed a civil suit for possession valued at Rs. 40,500 and paid court fee of Rs. 4,530 using stamps. The court ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Taxing Master's Order on Court Fees in Property Suit — Court Fees Must Be Paid on Current Market Value Under Section 5 of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959. Plaintiff's Challenge to Order Directing Payment of Court Fees on Current Market Value Dismissed as Consent Decree in Prior Suit Does Not Affect Court Fee Liability in Subsequent Suit.

24 Jul 2013

The plaintiff, Smt. Hema Valecha, filed a Chamber Summons challenging an order dated 2nd May 2011 passed by the learned Taxing Master of the Bombay Hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Family Court Order Directing Husband to Pay Full Ad Valorem Court Fees on Claim for Recovery of Amount in Matrimonial Dispute. Court Fees Act, 1959 - Section 8 - Inquiry into Court Fees - Held that when a party claims a specific sum of money, court fees must be paid on that amount, and the court can treat an application as an inquiry under Section 8.

6 Apr 2018

The petitioner-husband, Shri Vijay Jagdish Chheda, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the Family Court No. 2, Pune...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Challenge Against Excessive Enrolment Fees by State Bar Councils — Additional Fees Beyond Section 24(1)(f) of Advocates Act Held Unconstitutional. The Court ruled that SBCs cannot impose any extra charges at enrolment, as the statutory fee is exhaustive and any additional levy violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).

30 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution against the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Rejection of Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Suit for Damages. Court fees are not payable on a tentative claim at the initial stage when the exact valuation is to be adjudicated later, as per Section 7(i) of the Court Fees Act, 1870 and Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

16 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a suit filed by the respondent, a retired government officer and advocate, against the State of Punjab and its officers for rec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Court Fees Dispute for Injunction Suit. Suit for Simplicitor Injunction Falls Under Section 6(iv)(j) of Bombay Court Fees Act, Not Section 6(iv)(d) for Possession.

13 Feb 2013

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Plaintiffs (Lalchand Kalro and others) against the Respondents (Neeraj Lalchand Kalro and others) chall...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Refund of Court Fees in Suit Settled Through Mediation Under Section 89 CPC. Court Holds That Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Does Not Mandate Refund Upon Settlement Through Alternative Dispute Resolution.

1 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Sanjeevkumar Harakchand Kankariya, entered into an agreement to sell immovable property with respondents No.3 and 4. When the agreemen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Refund of Court Fees in Motor Accident Claims Settled Through Lok Adalat or Mediation Under Section 89 CPC. Fees paid under Rule 278(i) of Motor Vehicles Rules, 1991 are refundable under Section 16 of Court Fees Act, 1870 read with Section 21 of Legal Services Act, 1987.

23 Oct 2013

The Bombay High Court at Goa took suo motu cognizance of a submission by the Registrar (Judicial) & Member Secretary of the Goa State Legal Services A...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)