Search Results for "Consumer Complaint"

448 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 448 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rulings Clarify

The appeals concerning the definition of "commercial purpose" under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (now 2019). The key issue is whether a company's...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revision Petition in Consumer Execution Proceedings. Holds that Execution is Continuation of Consumer Dispute Under Section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The present Civil Appeal arose out of execution proceedings initiated by the Respondent-Complainant, K. A. Nagamani, against the Appellant, Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows University's Petition to Quash Consumer Forum Proceedings. Educational Services Not Covered Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The petitioner, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, a statutory university established under the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Orders MSEDCL to Refund Excess Charges to Consumers Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. found in violation of MERC orders; Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum directs refunds with interest.

The consolidated petitions, involving orders passed by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (CGRF) in individual complaints against the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Class Action in Consumer Dispute Over Non-Delivery of Commercial Units. The Court Held That Sameness of Interest, Not Identical Cause of Action, Is Required for Class Action Under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissing a complaint filed by 44 appellants under Section 12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court: Promotional Trailers Do Not Create Contractual Obligations; No Deficiency in Service or Unfair Trade Practice. Creative Freedom in Art Protects Film Producers from Consumer Claims Regarding Missing Promotional Content.

The Supreme Court addressed whether a promotional trailer creates a contractual obligation or leads to an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Ruled on the Definition of ‘Consumer’ Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 in Loan Transactions

The Apex Court Held That a Borrower of a Project Loan Does Not Qualify as a ‘Consumer’ When the Loan is Availed for Commercial Purposes The Supre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Against MSEDCL Over Tariff Categorization of LPG Bottling Plant as Industrial Activity. LPG Bottling Plant Held to Be Manufacturing Activity Entitling Petitioner to HT I Industrial Tariff Under MERC Tariff Order.

The Petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, challenged the categorization of its LPG Gas Bottling Plant at Sangli under the HT II Co...