Search Results for "Collector enquiry"

1542 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1542 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Admissibility of Confessional Statements to Customs Officers Under Customs Act, 1962. Customs Officers Held Not Police Officers Under Section 25 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 as They Lack Power to Submit Charge Sheet Under Section 173 of Code of Criminal Procedure.

The appeal arose from criminal proceedings initiated by the Collector of Customs, Madras, against Illias and nine others for offences under Section 12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Revenue Entries Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Property Rights Restored as Ex-Parte Cancellation Without Notice Held Illegal Under Articles 14, 19, 300A, 226, 227 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Thakkar Yogeshbhai Amritlal, filed a petition under Articles 14, 19, 300A, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging multi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Collector to Reconsider NA Applications in Land Revenue Matter — Procedural Compliance Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Required. Collector's Rejection of NA Applications Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Statutory Procedure Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, owners of various lands in Bhayander (West), Thane, filed applications dated 13/7/2010 and 11/8/2010 before the Collector, Thane, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Selection Process in District Beed Recruitment Due to Malpractices. Selection Committee Has Power to Cancel Vitiated Process Even If Some Candidates Are Innocent.

The petitioners, four individuals who were selected for clerical and Talathi posts in a recruitment process conducted by the District Selection Commit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- for Electronic Stamps Purchased Under Wrong Scheme Code. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Refund When Stamps Not Used and No Unjust Enrichment.

The petitioner, Manjeet Singh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of stamp duty paid under a mistake of law. The peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Collector's Order on Disqualification References Under Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986. Preliminary Objections Regarding Non-Compliance with Rule 6 and Verification Requirements Rejected as Technicalities.

The petitioners, elected members of Zilla Parishad, Dhule, challenged an order dated 27 May 2009 passed by the Collector, Dhule, which turned down the...