Bombay High Court Directs Collector to Reconsider NA Applications in Land Revenue Matter — Procedural Compliance Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Required. Collector's Rejection of NA Applications Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Statutory Procedure Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 21
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, owners of various lands in Bhayander (West), Thane, filed applications dated 13/7/2010 and 11/8/2010 before the Collector, Thane, seeking Non-Agricultural (NA) permission under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The Collector rejected these applications without following the procedure prescribed under the Code. Aggrieved, the petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Collector to reconsider their applications in accordance with law. The court observed that the Collector's order did not reflect any application of mind or compliance with the statutory procedure. The court held that the Collector must reconsider the applications afresh, following the due process under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The petition was allowed, and the Collector was directed to pass a fresh order within a reasonable time.

Headnote

A) Land Revenue - Non-Agricultural Permission - Duty to Consider - Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Petitioners applied for NA permission for their lands; Collector rejected applications without following prescribed procedure - Court held that the Collector must reconsider the applications in accordance with law and procedure under the Code - Held that the impugned order was unsustainable as it did not comply with statutory requirements (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Collector was justified in rejecting the petitioners' applications for Non-Agricultural (NA) permission without following the procedure laid down under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order of the Collector is set aside. The Collector is directed to reconsider the petitioners' applications dated 13/7/2010 and 11/8/2010 afresh in accordance with law and the procedure under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and pass a reasoned order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • duty to consider applications
  • procedural compliance under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code
  • 1966
  • writ jurisdiction under Article 226
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (07) 140

WRIT PETITION NO.2399 OF 2011

2011-07-08

MOHIT S. SHAH, C. J., GIRISH GODBOLE, J

Mr. Sandesh D. Patil and Mr. Harish P Jain for petitioners; Mr. S.N.Patil, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2; Ms. Sheetal Shah i/b. Mehta & Giridharlal for respondent No.3

Mr. Shrikant Keshavrao Rakvi and others

The State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to Collector to reconsider applications for Non-Agricultural permission.

Remedy Sought

Direction to Respondent No.2 (Collector, Thane) to reconsider the applications dated 11/8/2010 and 13/7/2010 for NA permission following procedure under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

Filing Reason

Collector rejected the petitioners' applications for NA permission without following the prescribed procedure.

Issues

Whether the Collector's rejection of NA applications was sustainable without following procedure under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the Collector did not follow the procedure laid down under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 while rejecting their NA applications.

Ratio Decidendi

The Collector must follow the procedure prescribed under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 while deciding applications for Non-Agricultural permission. An order passed without such procedure is unsustainable and liable to be set aside.

Judgment Excerpts

By an appropriate writ/order/direction of this Hon’ble court the Respondent No.2 be directed to ‘Reconsider’ the applications dated 11/8/2010 and 13/7/2010 filed by the Petitioners for N.A. in respect of the properties mentioned therein by following the procedure as laid down under the provisions of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

Procedural History

Petitioners filed applications for NA permission on 13/7/2010 and 11/8/2010 before the Collector, Thane. The Collector rejected the applications. Petitioners then filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966:
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Collector to Reconsider NA Applications in Land Revenue Matter — Procedural Compliance Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Required. Collector's Rejection of NA Applications Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Statutor...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Civil Reference in Suit for Injunction Against Recovery of Non-Agricultural Charges Under Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, 1876. Civil Court Not Barred from Entertaining Suit as It Does Not Challenge Assessment but Merely Res...