Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Involving Cooperative Housing Societies and Developer Over MOFA Compliance. Pleadings Involve Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and Role of District Deputy Registrar.
9 May 2025...
Search Results for "Bombay Public Conveyance Act"
692 result(s) found
Found 692 result(s)
Supreme Court
"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."
5 Nov 2024The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...
- 753
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in MOFA Case Due to Binding Consent Decrees — Competent Authority Cannot Override Civil Court Decrees. Consent Decree Operates as Res Judicata and Estoppel Between Parties Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.
13 Jun 2024The Petitioner, owner of a larger property, had constructed a building and sold flats to purchasers who formed Respondent No. 2 Society. The Petitione...
- 555
High Court
Not mentioned (judgment text incomplete; final verdict not provided)
10 Nov 2023The writ petition filed before the Bombay High Court challenged the order dated 5 October 2021 passed by the District Deputy Registrar (Cooperative So...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdictional Order as Not Maintainable. Remedy Lies Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 After Final Award.
22 Apr 2021The petitioner, Tirupati Shopping Centre Premises Co-op. Society Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Filed by Builder Challenging Sealing of Property Under Enemy Property Act, 1968. Court Examines Legality of Order Passed by Deputy Secretary and Custodian After Earlier Withdrawal of Enemy Property Proceedings.
31 Jul 2015The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged as builder and developer, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Restrains Developers from Constructing Additional Buildings in Multi-Building Scheme Without Flat Owners' Consent Under MOFA. Disclosure of Potential Additional Construction Held Insufficient Where Specific Representations Were Made About FSI Utilisation and Layout.
22 Jan 2015The dispute centered on a 230-acre development known as the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), in which several cooperative housing societies of co...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration and Injunction in Property Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Title and Possession. Court holds that mere possession of property documents does not establish ownership and that plaintiffs must prove their title independently.
30 Nov -0001The plaintiffs, claiming to be owners and in possession of a plot of land in Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanen...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cooperative Society Election Process — Upholds Registrar's Powers Under MCS Act. The Court held that the Registrar has exclusive jurisdiction to decide disputes relating to election of committee members under Section 152A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and civil courts are barred from entertaining such matters.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Rasheesh Cooperative Housing Society Limited, a society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, filed a writ...
- 79
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Appeal by Charitable Society Regarding Leave to Institute Suit Under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Dispute Involves Whether a Society Registered Under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 Can Be Treated as a Trust and Sought Determination of the Conditions for Granting Leave Following Allegations of Financial Mismanagement and Breach of Trust.
1 Jan 1970The dispute arose from a suit instituted under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by two plaintiffs, Dr. Shelly Batra and Mrs. Usha Gupta...
- 48
