Search Results for "Article 110"

2196 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2196 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds MEP Notification for Iron Ore and Steel Products as Valid Exercise of Power Under Foreign Trade Act. Court holds that Minimum Export Price is a reasonable condition for export licensing and does not violate fundamental rights.

The petitioners, JSW Steel Limited and Welspun Tradings Limited, along with their officers, challenged the constitutional validity of the Minimum Expo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of MLAs Under Tenth Schedule. Speaker's Order Upheld as Valid Exercise of Constitutional Authority Under Article 191(2) and Paragraph 2(1)(a) of Tenth Schedule.

The petitioner, Girish Chodankar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order of the Speaker of the Goa Legislat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010068412019_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Provisional Release of Seized Car in Customs Case Pending Adjudication. Petitioner's imported Ford Mustang GT seized on suspicion of being a 1967 model; court orders release on furnishing bond and bank guarantee under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Sidharth Vijay Shah, imported a 2019 RHD Ford Mustang GT Coupe sports car valued at USD 46,730, paying customs duty of Rs. 72,48,875/-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 3310 OF 2017

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Duty Refund for Re-imported Goods Under Section 26(1)(b) of Customs Act, 1962 — Re-importation Within One Year of Export Qualifies for Refund Despite Procedural Lapses

The petitioner, Covestro India Private Limited, exported certain goods for exhibition purposes and subsequently re-imported them. The petitioner paid ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Validity of Proviso to Section 115JB(6) of Income Tax Act in SEZ Cases. The court held that the proviso inserted by Finance Act, 2011 is not ultra vires the SEZ Act and is valid and enforceable.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by companies operating in Special Economic Zones (SEZs) challenging the constitutional validity of t...