Search Results for "120 Days Limitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "120 Days Limitation"

539 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 539 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Suit Barred by Limitation. The court held that the plaint must be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC when the suit is clearly barred by limitation based on the averments in the plaint.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Romesh Satyanarayan Sharma, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15.07.2005 against the respondents, Mrs...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Defence Estate Officer in Arbitration Delay Case — Section 14 of Limitation Act Applicable to Section 34 Applications. The court held that time spent in pursuing remedy before wrong forum is liable to be excluded under Section 14, and the delay of few days in filing application under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was condonable.

20 Aug 2013

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Defence Estate Officer, Mumbai Circle, against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay Hig...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order on Limitation in Carriage by Air Act Case. The court held that the suit for damages for loss of cargo was not barred by limitation under Section 30 of the Carriage by Air Act, 1972, as the limitation period runs from the date of delivery or when the cargo ought to have been delivered.

2 Feb 2018

The petitioner, British Airways, challenged an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, which answered a preliminary issue on limitation in the negative...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condonation of Delay in Gratuity Appeal — Delay Beyond 120 Days Cannot Be Condoned Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Section 7(7) First Proviso Imposes Absolute Bar on Entertaining Appeal Filed After 120 Days from Receipt of Controlling Authority's Order.

5 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Changunabai Sambhaji Gaware, a retired employee, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Industrial Court dated 18.11.2014,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Condoning Delay of 129 Days in Arbitration Petition. Benefit of Section 14 of Limitation Act Extended as Earlier Filing in Delhi Court Was Bona Fide Despite Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction.

25 Jan 2017

The dispute arose from an arbitral award passed on 25 February 2014. The respondent, Globe Capital Market Ltd., challenged the award by filing an arbi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Delay Condonation Applications in MVAT Appeals Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. The court held that internal administrative delays and filing of Special Leave Petition do not constitute sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 27 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002.

19 Jul 2016

The Revenue (Additional Commissioner of Sales Tax) filed three Notices of Motion seeking condonation of delay in preferring appeals under Section 27 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Reference — Delay of 10 Days Condoned as Sufficient Cause Shown Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963. Court Held That Liberal Approach Should Be Adopted to Avoid Depriving Claimants of Substantial Rights Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

30 Nov -0001

The Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Executive Engineer filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application before the Bombay High Court at Goa seeking co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

12 Mar 2019

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defendants to File Written Statement Beyond 120 Days in Pre-2015 Commercial Suit. Mandatory timeline under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply retrospectively to suits filed before the Act and transferred to Commercial Division.

24 May 2019

The Bombay High Court addressed a preliminary legal question in a Notice of Motion arising from a Commercial Suit. The suit was originally filed in 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Restoration Petition in Arbitration Matter Due to Inordinate Delay. Delay of 382 days in seeking restoration of arbitration petition dismissed for non-compliance of office objections not condoned as arbitration proceedings require expeditious disposal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

7 Feb 2014

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the applicant (Mukti Films and its proprietor) seeking condonation of a 382-day delay in taking out a mo...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)