Search Results for "subsisting lease"

429 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 429 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement Not Proved and Time Not Essence. Plaintiff failed to establish execution of agreement for sale and readiness and willingness to perform, leading to dismissal of suit for specific performance.

The appellant, Shaikh Hidayat, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of property admeasuring about 11920 sq. mtrs. at Borda, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Order Refusing Interim Relief in Development Agreement Dispute. Court Upholds Trial Court's Discretion in Refusing Injunction Where Balance of Convenience Favored Status Quo and No Irreparable Loss Was Shown.

The appellant, Villa Realcon LLP, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated September...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records — No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Mutation entries are summary in nature and do not confer title; disputes regarding title must be resolved by a civil court.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging mutation entries made in the revenue reco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Property Tax Liability of Licensee Under Municipal Tender. Condition 15 of Tender Notice Makes Licensee Liable for Municipal Assessment Taxes, Including Property Tax, Despite Ownership Vesting in Corporation.

The petitioner, Raj Dadarkar & Associates, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit Seeking Removal of Managing Director on Ground of Age Limit Under Companies Act, 2013. Section 196(3)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 Held Not Retrospective and Does Not Automatically Terminate Existing Appointments.

The plaintiff, a director of Ultramarine & Pigments Limited, filed a suit seeking an order to restrain the 2nd defendant, the Chairman and Managing Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Due to Suppression of Material Facts. Plaintiff's Conduct of Suppressing Prior User and Earlier Litigation Disentitles It to Equitable Relief Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957.

The suit was filed by ITC Limited against NTC Industries Ltd. for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off in relation to cigarettes and t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Unauthorised Subletting Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Subtenant failed to prove lawful subletting as tenant did not obtain landlady's written consent under Section 15 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the original defendant no.2 (petitioner no.1) and defendant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court Held That Second Appeal Cannot Be Entertained on Reappreciation of Evidence When No Substantial Question of Law Arises.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment of the Principal District Judge, Ratnagiri, dismi...