Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Unauthorised Subletting Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Subtenant failed to prove lawful subletting as tenant did not obtain landlady's written consent under Section 15 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 75
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the original defendant no.2 (petitioner no.1) and defendant no.3 (petitioner no.2) challenging the eviction decree passed by the trial court and maintained by the appellate court. The respondent no.1 (original plaintiff) is the landlady of a shop, and respondent no.2 (original defendant no.1) was the tenant. The petitioners were the tenant and subtenant respectively. The rent agreed was Rs.2500 per month. The landlady filed a suit for eviction on the ground that the tenant had sublet the premises to the subtenant without her written consent, which is prohibited under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The trial court decreed eviction, and the appellate court confirmed the decree. The petitioners argued that the subletting was with the consent of the landlady, but they failed to produce any written consent. The court held that under Section 15, subletting without the written consent of the landlord is unlawful, and the burden of proof lies on the tenant to show that consent was obtained. Since no such consent was proved, the eviction decree was upheld. The writ petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Rent Control - Unauthorised Subletting - Section 15 Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Eviction - The landlady sought eviction of tenant and subtenant on ground of unauthorised subletting. The tenant failed to prove that he had obtained written consent of the landlady before subletting. The trial court and appellate court decreed eviction. Held that subletting without written consent of landlord is unlawful and liable for eviction (Paras 2-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the subletting by the tenant to the subtenant was lawful under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and whether the courts below correctly decreed eviction.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition dismissed; eviction decree upheld.

Law Points

  • Unauthorised subletting
  • Written consent of landlord
  • Burden of proof on tenant
  • Section 15 Maharashtra Rent Control Act
  • 1999
  • Eviction decree
  • Article 227 Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (07) 132

WRIT PETITION NO.6936 OF 2015

2016-07-28

A.S. Chandurkar, J.

Shri A. Shelat for petitioners, Shri D. N. Dani for respondent no.1

Shri Sagar Bhagwat and Smt. Harjeet Chhabra

Smt. Kiran Leekha and Jaikashyap Kashyap C. M.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 227 challenging eviction decree for unauthorised subletting.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to set aside the eviction decree passed by the trial court and confirmed by the appellate court.

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed that subletting was with consent of landlady, but failed to produce written consent.

Previous Decisions

Trial court decreed eviction; appellate court confirmed the decree.

Issues

Whether the subletting by the tenant to the subtenant was lawful under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999? Whether the courts below correctly decreed eviction?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that subletting was with the consent of the landlady. Respondent argued that no written consent was obtained, making subletting unlawful.

Ratio Decidendi

Subletting without written consent of the landlord is unlawful under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and the burden of proof lies on the tenant to show that consent was obtained.

Judgment Excerpts

Subletting without written consent of the landlord is unlawful under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

Procedural History

The landlady filed a suit for eviction in the trial court, which decreed eviction. The petitioners appealed to the appellate court, which confirmed the decree. The petitioners then filed a writ petition under Article 227 in the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999: Section 15
  • Constitution of India: Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Unauthorised Subletting Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Subtenant failed to prove lawful subletting as tenant did not obtain landlady's written consent under Section 15 of ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MHADA's Refusal to Register Proposed Cooperative Housing Society Under Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976 — Held That a Proposed Society Is Entitled to Seek Registration and the Authority Cannot Refuse ...