Search Results for "promotion orders"

1952 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1952 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Municipal Workers Challenging Reversion to Original Posts. Corporation's action of reverting Safai Kamgars who worked as clerks for years held illegal without following principles of natural justice and without considering the 2005 Resolution.

The Bombay High Court allowed a group of writ petitions filed by employees of Bhiwandi Nizampura City Municipal Corporation challenging their reversio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Lecturers Challenging Termination by Unaided Private Engineering College. Termination of Probationers for Unsatisfactory Performance Does Not Amount to Retrenchment Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Is Not an Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by lecturers (Sudhakar Shivaram Teke, Prof. S. S. Rayamane, and Udaykumar Govindrao Gurlhosur) agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses CAG's Petition Challenging CAT Order Granting Retrospective Seniority to Employee in Seniority Dispute. Seniority must be assigned from date of eligibility, not from date of actual promotion, where delay is not attributable to employee.

The case involves a dispute over seniority in the cadre of Assistant Audit Officer (AAO) between the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Temporary AEEs in Panchayat Raj Department — Quashes High Court Order Striking Down Regularization G.O.M. No. 262. Seniority of Pre-1994 Appointees Must Be Counted from Initial Appointment Date, Not Below Later Recruits.

The case involves appeals by temporary Assistant Executive Engineers (AEEs) appointed between 1990-1992 in the Panchayat Raj Department of Andhra Prad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes CAT Interim Order in Service Matter — Deputation Absorption Dispute. CAT lacked jurisdiction to restrain State Government from absorbing deputationists into Karnataka Administrative Service, and order passed without hearing affected parties violates natural justice.

The petitioners, eight officers of the Karnataka State Government, were on deputation to various departments and were sought to be absorbed into the K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of PTI Selection by Haryana Staff Selection Commission Due to Arbitrary Change in Criteria. The selection process violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution as the Commission altered the marking scheme after interviews without any rational basis.

The case pertains to a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which quashed the selection of Physical T...