Search Results for "implied bar"

887 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 887 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders in Domestic Violence Act Jurisdiction Dispute — Holds That JMFC at Akot Lacks Jurisdiction as Incident Occurred at Nasik. Section 27 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Requires Proceedings at Place of Residence or Employment of Aggrieved Person.

The petitioners, Ramesh s/o Mohanlal Bhutada and Shobha w/o Ramesh Bhutada, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Labourer Death. Insurer Liable Despite Alleged Commercial Use of Tractor Trolley as Policy Covered Labourers and No Breach Proved.

The appeal was filed by The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 02.02.2000 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Assault on Public Servant Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 353, 294, 506 IPC and Arms Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ranjitsingh Gulabsingh Chungade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in Sessions Trial 234/2002 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 107119 OF 2025 (APMC)

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Between State of Maharashtra and Developer. Court Holds That Existence of Arbitration Clause and Failure of Respondent to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Appointment Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The State of Maharashtra filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to reso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal by Patel Engineering Ltd in Import Misdeclaration Case. Confiscation of Goods and Penalty Upheld for Violation of Sections 111(d) and (m) of Customs Act, 1962.

The appellant, Patel Engineering Ltd, filed a Customs Appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the concurrent findings of the Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Foreign Award — Part I of Arbitration Act Inapplicable. Section 34 petition under Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 held not maintainable for foreign award with seat in London.

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the appellant's arbitration petition under section 34 of ...