Search Results for "customs adjudication"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "customs adjudication"

692 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 692 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Show-Cause Notice for Penalty Under Section 11AC Not Barred by Section 11A(2B) Despite Pre-Notice Duty Payment. CESTAT Erred in Holding That Payment of Duty Before Show-Cause Notice Precludes Issuance of Notice for Penalty.

9 Feb 2011

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Predeposit Order for Public Sector Undertaking in Central Excise Matter - Prima Facie Case and Financial Solvency Must Be Considered Under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court held that a Public Sector Undertaking of substantial worth and solvency cannot be directed to predeposit 50% of duty without considering its prima facie case and ability to secure revenue by bond.

28 Jun 2011

The appellant, M/s. Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilisers Ltd., a Public Sector Undertaking and Government Company under Section 617 of the Companies Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Challenging Service Tax Demand and Section 35F Validity — Petitioner Relegated to Alternate Remedy of Appeal. Constitutional challenge to Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 not entertained as validity already upheld; factual disputes remitted to appellate authority.

10 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Tyresoles India Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 14 October 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Central Exci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Forfeiture of Property Under SAFEMA Despite Revocation of Detention Order. Property of Detenu Forfeited Under Sections 7 and 19(1) of SAFEMA Upheld as Detention Order Was Valid When Forfeiture Order Was Passed.

11 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Smt. Padma Nirmal Agarwal, challenged the forfeiture of a flat (Flat No.16, 471/C, Manu Mahal, King's Circle, Mumbai) under the Smuggl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Classification of Stainless Steel Water Filter as Utensil Under Bombay Sales Tax Act. Water Filter Held to Be a Utensil Covered by Schedule Entry C-II-46, Not a General Item.

21 Oct 2005

The case involved two references under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1958, at the instance of the Revenue. The respondent, M/s Neelam App...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Rejection of KVSS Declaration — Post-Manufacturing Expenses Dispute. The court held that an appeal is pending until the order is communicated to the party, and thus the declaration under Section 95 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998 was validly filed.

19 Jan 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Pepsico India Holdings Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing aerated water, soft drinks, and fruit-pulp based drinks, was issu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Indian Airlines' Petition, Upholds Termination of Employee for Loss of Confidence Due to Gold Smuggling. Termination Without Enquiry Valid Under Standing Orders as Employee's Acts Posed Security Threat to Aircraft and Passengers.

27 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Indian Airlines Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court which declared the termination of the first respondent's services...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Insurance Claim Dispute — Underinsurance Calculation Upheld as Not Perverse. Court finds no patent illegality in tribunal's assessment of 55% underinsurance on replacement value basis.

9 Mar 2015

The petitioner, M/s Lift and Shift India Pvt. Ltd., imported a second-hand crawler crane in 2004 and insured it with the respondent, M/s Iffco Tokio G...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Pre-Deposit Order in CENVAT Credit Case — Prima Facie Case for Waiver of Pre-Deposit Established. The Court held that the appellant had made out a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the statements relied upon were retracted and no opportunity for cross-examination was given.

8 May 2015

The appellant, Ms. Arjandas Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against an order dated 10th ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Retraction of Statement and Bail Conditions Ignored, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

3 Jul 2015

The petitioner, son of the detenu Bittu Choith Harchandani, challenged a detention order dated 16.4.2015 passed by the second respondent under Section...

37 38 39 40 41

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)