Search Results for "consent arbitral award"

930 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 930 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 and 11 Petitions in License Termination Dispute with Airports Authority of India. Disputes Over Termination of License to Occupy Airport Premises Held Arbitrable Despite Public Premises Act.

The Bombay High Court dealt with three connected proceedings: two petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and one app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favour of Assignee Under Part II of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Assignment of Contractual Rights and Arbitration Agreement Valid Under Sudanese Law; Respondent's Public Policy Challenge Rejected.

The petitioner, Neilan International Co Ltd, a Sudanese company, sought enforcement of a foreign arbitral award dated 27 September 2018 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Defence Contract Dispute Over Encashment of Warranty Bond. The court held that the claims were not barred by limitation as bilateral discussions continued until 2019, and the arbitration clause covered the dispute.

The petitioner, a Swiss company engaged in arms manufacturing, entered into a contract with the Ministry of Defence, Government of India, for supply o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Property Tax Demands Due to Delay and Availability of Alternate Remedy. Court holds that appeals under Section 406 of BPMC Act filed after 8-18 years are grossly delayed and cannot be entertained.

The petitioner, NRC Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, owned a large property in Kalyan. The Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Cor...