Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

461 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Suspension Order Under Rule 10(1)(aa) of Karnataka Civil Services Rules, 1957 — Sub-rule (1)(aa) Has Overriding Effect Over Sub-rule (3). Possession of Disproportionate Assets Justifies Suspension Without Prior Approval.

The petitioner, S.L. Haleshappa, an Assistant Engineer (working as Assistant Executive Engineer in-charge) in the Karnataka Housing Board, was placed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in CBI Case Due to Settlement Commission Immunity — Criminal Conspiracy and Corruption Charges Quashed Against Company Granted Immunity Under Central Excise Act, 1944 and Customs Act, 1962.

The appellant, Baccarose Perfumes and Beauty Products Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing and exporting cosmetics from a unit in Kandla Spec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ghanshyam Hari Pagare, a Talathi (revenue officer), was convicted by the Special Judge, Nashik, in Special Case No.4 of 1993 for offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance Not Proved. Sanction Held Invalid Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent (accused), a Forest Guard, in Special Criminal Case No.1/2008 by the Additio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti Corruption Bureau, Bhandara, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 29.11.2013 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Patwari in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay Ramdas Kalmegh, was a Patwari at Pimpri-Deshmukh, Maharashtra. The complainant, Raghunath Tandale, owned agricultural land and a...