High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Project Manager of Private Society in Corruption Case — Petitioner Not a Public Servant Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Nirmithi Kendra Being a Private Society Unconnected with Government Activities, Its Employee Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 13(1)(e) r/w Section 13(2) of PC Act.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Gopinath @ Gopinathsa, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No.8/2013 registered by the Lokayukta Police, Bijapur on 25.9.2013 under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The petitioner was employed as Project Manager of Nirmithi Kendra Bijapur, which was contended to be a private society and not a government entity. The court heard arguments from both sides. The petitioner's counsel argued that Nirmithi Kendra is a private society governed by its own Governing Body, and the petitioner is not a public servant. The respondent's counsel represented the Lokayukta. The court observed that the objects of Nirmithi Kendra are to develop skills in construction area, whether private or public, by way of civil contract, and the entire control, administration and management is solely governed by its Governing Body. The court held that the petitioner, being an employee of a private society unconnected with government activities, does not fall within the definition of a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Consequently, the FIR was quashed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Prevention of Corruption Act - Public Servant - Section 13(1)(e) r/w Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Petitioner employed as Project Manager of Nirmithi Kendra Bijapur, a private society unconnected with government activities - Held that petitioner is not a public servant under the Act, hence FIR liable to be quashed (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, a Project Manager of Nirmithi Kendra Bijapur (a private society), can be prosecuted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for alleged disproportionate assets.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR No.8/2013 dated 25.9.2013 registered by the Lokayukta Police, Bijapur under Section 13(1)(e) r/w Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

Law Points

  • Public servant definition
  • Private society employee not public servant
  • Quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC
  • Prevention of Corruption Act applicability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (12) 32

Criminal Petition No.15932 of 2013

2013-12-06

Huluvadi G. Ramesh

Sri.B.Bapegowda (for petitioner), Sri.A.Syed Habeeb (Special SPP for respondent)

Gopinath @ Gopinathsa

The Superintendent of Police, Karnataka Lokayukta, Bijapur and The Police Inspector, Karnataka Lokayukta, Bijapur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR registered under Prevention of Corruption Act.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No.8/2013 dated 25.9.2013 registered by Lokayukta Police, Bijapur under Section 13(1)(e) r/w Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged that he is not a public servant as he is employed by a private society (Nirmithi Kendra Bijapur) and thus cannot be prosecuted under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Issues

Whether the petitioner, being an employee of a private society, can be considered a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued that Nirmithi Kendra is a private society unconnected with government activities, governed by its own Governing Body, and the petitioner is not a public servant. Respondent's counsel represented the Lokayukta but no specific arguments are recorded in the judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

An employee of a private society, which is not connected with government activities and is solely governed by its own Governing Body, does not fall within the definition of a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Hence, prosecution under Section 13(1)(e) r/w Section 13(2) of the Act is not maintainable.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner is before this Court seeking to quash the First Information Report filed by the Lokayukta Police in Crime No.8/2013 on 25.9.2013 under S.13(1)(e) r/w S.13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. It appears that petitioner has been serving as Project Manager of Nirmithi Kendra Bijapur, which is said to be a private society and unconnected with Government activities. The entire control, administration and management is solely governed by the Government body of the Kendra.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Petition No.15932 of 2013 under Section 482 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka, Gulbarga Bench, seeking quashing of FIR No.8/2013 dated 25.9.2013 registered by the Lokayukta Police, Bijapur under Section 13(1)(e) r/w Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court heard arguments and passed the order on 6.12.2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: 13(1)(e), 13(2)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Project Manager of Private Society in Corruption Case — Petitioner Not a Public Servant Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Nirmithi Kendra Being a Private Society Unconnected with Government Activi...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Purchaser's Appeal and Upholds High Court's Decision Allowing Redemption Under SARFAESI Act Due to Non-Completion of Sale by Registration. Right of Redemption Under Section 13(8) SARFAESI Act Survives Until Registered Sale Dee...