Search Results for "special land acquisition officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "special land acquisition officer"

2028 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2028 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Fresh Acquisition Under 2013 Act Where Land Acquisition Proceedings Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation. Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 1894 Act Deemed Lapsed as Award Not Declared and Possession Not Taken, Violating Article 300-A Right to Property.

5 May 2026

The petitioner, Roshan Shrikant Tandel, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the acquisition proceedings concerning his land...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs MHADA to Pay Compensation for Land Acquired 36 Years Ago Without Award — Violation of Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution. Non-payment of compensation for compulsory acquisition under Section 93(5) of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, held arbitrary and unconstitutional; court orders payment with interest at 9% per annum from date of possession.

1 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Yusuf Yunus Kantharia, was the owner of a plot of land measuring 979 sq. metres in Dharavi, Mumbai, along with a chawl known as Kantha...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Non-Compliance with Award or Possession Requirements.

9 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Ramchandra Jamnadas Sadriwala, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court seeking a declaration that the land acquisition pro...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Declaring Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Award Not Made Within Two Years of Final Declaration. Failure to Comply with Mandatory Time Limit Under Section 11A Results in Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings for Land in Sy.No.44/2 at Yelechenahalli Village.

28 Feb 2013

The petitioner, K L Ramesh, claiming to be the owner of land measuring 3 acres 9 guntas in Sy.No.44/2 at Yelechenahalli Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Ba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Unsigned Award Declared Invalid. An award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 must be signed by the officer; death of officer before signing renders award a nullity and land does not vest under Section 16.

15 Mar 2019

The case involves a second appeal by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment of the District Court, Thane, which reversed the trial ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Mechanical Rejection of Rehabilitation Claims Under National Highways Act. The Court held that the provisions of the First, Second, and Third Schedules of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 apply to land acquisition under the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Competent Authority must individually assess each claimant's entitlement to rehabilitation and resettlement benefits.

25 Oct 2024

This batch of writ petitions involved a common question of law: whether and how the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in L...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.

16 Aug 2018

The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Slum Land Acquisition Despite Interim Stay on Declaration — Acquisition Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Valid as Stay Did Not Cover Acquisition Proceedings

1 Mar 2016

The petitioners, Murlidhar Teckchand Gandhi and others, owned property bearing CTS No. 165, 165/1 to 51 at Village Kanjur, Mumbai. The property was de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

6 Feb 2015

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

36 37 38 39 40

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)